blogger wonderland’s identity

… Bill Randell could use this letter! … Billy, or anyone in town, PLEASE feel free to print out and USE! Mail this letter out to Claude Dorman (Wonderland blogger) 38 Sever St., Worcester, MA 01609. If Dorman has enough folks taking him to court, mailing out lets to the DA, he may have to continue to hire his lawyer – some guy from Spencer that Paul Collyer says looks like a mob guy – to defend him. Let’s make Dorman, a notorious cheap-skate, spend $$$. – “Rose”

Here is the letter:

District Attorney Joseph. E. Early
225 Main Street
Worcester, MA 01608

Police Chief Gary Gemme
9-11 Lincoln Square
Worcester, MA 01608

Dear Sirs:

Recently a Worcester man used, without my permission, my business email address to send out emails in my name to a number of Worcester city officials. I believe that the individual who did this was Claude Dorman of 38 Sever St., Worcester, MA.

This is not the first time Mr. Dorman has used my business email to send out negative email about me. I have consulted with an attorney and have been advised that Mr. Dorman has violated Mass. Gen. L. c. 266 Section 37E regarding identity fraud. This statute defines “pose” in the context of identity crime as “to falsely represent oneself, either directly or indirectly, as another person or persons.”

Mr. Dorman in doing this has caused me both financial and emotional harm. I request that me Dorman be charged with violating Mass. Gen. L. c. 266 Section 37E.

Sincerely yours,

name

CC: Claude Dorman
**************

Claude Dorman, outside the Worcester Courthouse this past March. It was Dorman vs. Paulie Collyer.

… re: Claude Dorman aka Will WW, the Worcester Wonderland blogger. Not the detective bureau.

Tomorrow I will send the DA’s office a letter. It never ends with ol’ Claude; he’s pushing 60, he’s unemployed and … a Worcester pariah.

R. Tirella

Learn all about the Worcester Wonderland “anonymous” blogger Claude Dorman of  38 Sever St., Worceser (he writes as Will WW) at this site: http://claudepdorman-worcesterwonderlandetal.blogspot.com/ Learn about his several trips to court, his false YELP reports, his accusing innocent men of being sexual predators …

Worcester Wonderland blogger lies: We distribute thousands of InCity Times all over Worcester, Auburn, West Boylston, Shrewsbury and sometimes Holden, every two weeks. We are a biweekly with an almost 12 year history in the city. Our readers love us! Our advertisers are great!  Just this morning I talked with an ICT advertiser who told me his InCity Times ad was working big time for him.

This latest toxic Wonderland blog post may have something to do with my calling the Worcester Police Department’s detective bureau on  Claude Dorman/Will WW LAST WEEK. The WPD detective I spoke with was very nice – told me he has confronted Claude about his blog and Claude denies authorship. This time I told the WPD detective that Nick Bouzakis,  who worked for the Worcester DA’s office, is the lawyer who represented Paul Collyer in court and asked Claude, when he was under oath, if he was indeed the Wonderland blogger. Claude said YES. I told the detective to call Nicky to learn ALL about Claude.

Dorman bumped into Paulie in Worcester 3 or so weeks ago. He was TERRIFIED of Paul and ran out of the store! What an inane chicken.

Dorman may find out just how many InCity Times readers we have when we print photos of him in InCity Times  (we have a ton of Claude pics), list his address (38 Sever St.)  and recount his toxic  history. Dorman couldn’t do what I do on his best day – for a day. Let alone almost 12 years.

HE LIES ABOUT EVERYONE! AND IS ALWAYS CALLED OUT!

Claude will be heading to court again, courtesy of Collyer. The Worcester police department and DA’s office will be kept up to date on his slander, car insurance fraud, courtesy of me!

- R. Tirella

By Rosalie Tirella

… one of Worcester’s loathesome ‘anonymous’ cyber bullies has dumped on everybody – even Jesus. Writing a few years back, under his name and not Internet moniker THE COUNT, Kush wrote to his readers, HAPPY ZOMBIE JESUS DAY. It was early April. We can assume Kush was wishing his cohorts a Happy Easter.

What does Worcester get if it chooses to make this nincompoop a city councilor? It gets a cyber bully. A coward. An immature and stupid kid, too connected to have to work hard and chart his own course. A kid who knows that because he is the son of a long-time reporter at the T and G that he will get the powder puff treatment as he makes his belly flop into politics. A guy who has lied about Worcester’s public and private folks, a guy who trumpeted his disdain for Worcester only to turn around and decide that he wants to represent her people as an elected official, a stupid kid who got a city job through his parents and then decided to trash the city, Worcester, in an anonymous blog, STUCK IN COW.

Who needs a twit like Kush deciding important issues like city pension reform or slot casino violence? Who needs a guy who for years was known in the Woo blogosphere as The Count, a persona from which spewed all sorts of hateful ideas, loathesome comments about all things Worcester. Kush, as cowardly and sick as local blogger Claude Dorman, who has been hauled into court several times for the libel/lies he upchucks, was never brave enough to use his real name when writing vile, hurtful lies. Like Dorman, who lives on 38 Sever St., and blogs as the ‘anonymous’ whack job Will WW on his Worcester Wonderland blog, Kush was ‘outed’ by local dude Paulie Collyer. Collyer, who can sniff out a creep as expertly as his sweet Beagle Ginny can track a weiner all the way to Coney Island Hot Dogs, was not up for Kush’s venom. Kush’s lies about him and his life sent Paulie on a journey: The quest to unmask THE COUNT, who by the way, left little photos of The Muppet character as a visual tag to go with his toxic tales, all of which were written while he was an employee of the City of Worcester.

It is pathetic when someone stupid manages to land a job with the city because he is somewhat connected – Kush’s mother Kathy Robertson worked as a community liason flak for Holy Cross college and his dad, Bronny Kush writes for the daily – but it is insulting when the connected loser is the author of an anti-Worcester blog, STUCK IN COW. COW being the acronym for City of Worcester.

Kush also took money from local political candidates as a political consultant – a bribe to get in good with Daddy-Reporter Kush? – only to trash his clients on his blog and Claude Dorman’s blog.

Idiots like Kush and Dorman act out, like all bullies, to feel better about themselves. Woo should send them both packing to … Afghanistan.

By Rosalie Tirella

I suppose if you do not live on Lafayette, Lodi, Meade, Grosvenor, Scott or Langden – the streets ACROSS from the old Wyman Gordon – the proposed slots parlor looks like a pretty good deal to you.

After all, city movers and shakers have gotten the city a hotel and other downtown amenities as a big thank you from the gaming guys. A big bribe for Worcester to sweeten a horrible dish – a slots parlor, for the Wyman Gordon site in Green Island. A slots parlor with 1,200 computerized slot machines that take credit and debit cards. A slots parlor, the kind of attraction no city or town wants.

When I was a kid growing up on Lafayette Street I was keenly aware of the fact that I was living in one of Wusta’s tuff neighborhoods. Not so much as a child, attending nearby Lamartine Street School, but as a teenager attending Providence Street Junior High, and later Burncoat Senior High. All my junior high and senior high pals were great, but I always cringed whenever they picked me up or dropped me off in their cars to go somewhere. At the beginning of Lafayette Street you had a strip joint (today, true to its stripper roots, a Hurricane Betty’s). Millbury Street, where my mom worked and my family shopped, was home to almost a score of seedy bars, places out of which men and women would stumble, drunk and bellicose. Lafayette Street had two bars, for Cripe’s sake: Ben’s Cafe and the old PNA club.

I was awash in booze!!! But I had a great mom who kept her girls straight – school every day, church every Sunday or Saturday eve,The Girls Club in summertime, after school jobs as soon as we turned 14 and a half years old (kids got work cards then). Summer and weekend fun with my aunts and uncles and their kids.

I was too busy being raised by Mrs. Tirella to sink into the world around me, even though my sisters and I were real neighborhood girls. We played with the neighborhood kids, walked to church, walked to Millbury Street every day for after school treats like burgers and cokes at the old Peter’s Dairy Bar or Messier’s Diner or even a bowl of clam chowder with our mom at Charles Restaurant – heaven! We were totally part of our urban environs. I saw lots of good and bad things. Stuff that delighted me, stuff that scared me. But out my mom and sisters and I went every day into what I now realize was a very rich, complex urban environment.

In a way, the Wynan Gordon site, then the Wyman Gordon factory, kind of anchored my world. It was where people worked, worked hard. It was a gated, no-fun place for me as a kid. A place that was noisy with machines and guys in hard hats worked hard. Big steel tubes were stacked in pyramids. They sparkled in the sun. I was kinda proud of the factory. It was always busy, it was always safe to walk by it as we made our way to the Worcester Public Libray on Salem Street. A City of Worcester Fire Station was right across the street as we made our way under the concrete over-pass. Urban, hectic, noisy. Sometimes unsafe, even violent. My old neighborhood.

Does Green Island need more noise, more social ills, more pain?

Claude Dorman, the Worcester Wonderland blogger (Will WW), leaving the Worcester courthouse last month.

Claude (Will WW) filed two (TWO!) reports with the Worcester Police Dept. on Steve, a man he has never met, a man who has never caused Claude any harm, a man for whom Cluade created CRIMES. False, false, false. Here is a portion of Steve’s letter to the attorney general’s office re: Claude Dorman (Will WW) of 38 Sever St., Worcester. I have made some sentences bold.   – R. Tirella:

1. In the redacted letter of January 9, 2013 shown at M-135 the blogmaster wrote: “I have filed two incident reports with the police.” I believe this is directly related to question of my discharge. I would like copies of any police reports [XXXX] has in their possession regarding this information.

1. In his letter to you, [XXXX] stated: “However, the IT Department did have such documents and provided them once this letter was received and a search was done to ensure all responsive documents were produced.” If I have not been given ALL the IT documents in [XXX]’s possession, I would like [XXXX] to state that in writing. If they have other documents I should be sent copies.

1. Chapter 149 Section 52C contains a loosely written phrase that a personnel file must include “any other documents relating to disciplinary action regarding the employee.”

Unfortunately, the state legislature did not define what “documents’ meant in this context. Nor does the Code of Massachusetts Regulations. I could not find any advisory on the Attorney General’s web site.

The central focus in this matter is my use of the company computer. That was the basis of the decision to discharge me and suspend me. I would therefore like to narrow the focus to those relevant emails can be retrieved at the least expense of time to [XXX]. I would like to request that {XXX] provided the following:

1. Copies of emails to [XX] and [XX] from the IT department on the investigation.

1. Copies of emails from the IT department to the HR representatives present where I was suspended.

1. Copies of the emails between [XXX] and [XXX] discussing the decision to suspend and terminate me. This are key documents regarding my discharge and ultimately were the records on which the decision was made.

I request that [XXX] submit an evidence log, listing all the files above it has, which ones were released, and their grounds for not releasing them

Thank you! I am attaching list of the documents in this letter, in the event you want to send it to [XXX] asking them the documents to me.

Sincerely yours,

**********

DOCUMENTS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IS ORDERED TO BE RELEASED BY [XXXXX]  TO STEVEN R. MAHER.

1. Internally produced [XXX] studies, which evaluate the allegations by Mr. Dorman, be they written or electronic.

1. Identify the HR representative who wrote the handwritten notes on M-151 and M-152 and the date they were written.

1. Any police reports [XXX] has in their possession regarding Steven R. Maher.

 …

editor’s note: How sick is Claude Dorman, the author of the Worcester Wonderland blog? Pretty sick. Dorman, who lives at 38 Sever St., Worcester, with his wife Kunigunde, didn’t like Steve visiting his website. So he went to the police and filed two police reports on Steve. Then he sent spread sheets, paper work galore re: Steve, trumped up charges, to Steve’s employer. Lies, lies, lies. Readers of Worcester Wonderland blog, where Dorman writes as the “anonymous” blogger Will W. W.,  PLEASE beware! You could be Dorman’s next victim! He wants to ruin people’s lives.

Here is a portion of the letter Steve sent to the attroney general’s office, re: Claude Dorman/Will W. W.. I have deleted his employer’s name and its attorney’s name, also the attorney general contact person’s name.  I have made some sentences bold. – R. Tirella 

***********************

Dear XXXX:

I received last night the response from XXXX Counsel XXXX. I am not wholly satisfied with the response. I received the following:

A letter dated January 9, 20013 from the “blogmaster” of the Worcester Wonderland website. (See M-135 attached.) I understand the blogmaster is Claude Dorman. I will presume it was his name that was redacted, and will reference him below.

Two sheets containing threats against Claude Dorman. These sheets do not contain any information linking me (such as an IP address) to these threats. (See attached M-136 and M-137.) XXX stated XXXX could not substantiate these threats.

What looks like a one page summary of five days in December 2013 (See M-138). Why this appears in a different format from the rest of the documents provided was not explained. I will state below why I believed this is a falsified document.

A thirteen page report on my access to the Worcester Wonderland website for December 2012. This does not look like a report generated from a reporting package. It looks like a spreadsheet printout. I believe it is possible Mr. Dorman downloaded this information and then falsified the spreadsheet by copying entries to other lines. (See M-139 through M-150).

Two pages of handwritten notes from an unidentified XXXX  person. (See M-151-M-152).

These documents raise a number of questions:

The complaint by Mr. Dorman dated January 9, 2013 references the report attached at M-139 through M-150. Yet if you look at M-148 through M-150 you see almost three pages of data dated after January 9, 2013. This is evidence that Mr. Dorman in fact fabricated this report, unless he has a time travel machine allowing him to go weeks ahead into the future to bring back to the past documents for his January 9, 2013 complaint.

This reports shows that much of the time I spent on this website were before the workday began, during my lunch period, or after work. This was not in violation of XXXX policy. To a large degree, this is exculpatory evidence for me, not XXXX. Additionally, most of the Internet visits were doing non-peak days of the month …

Mr. Dorman claims receiving threats from me on December 27, 2012 and December 31, 2012. (See M-136d M-137 Yet if you look at the report on pages M-139 through M-150 I was not logged on to the website at the time the alleged threats were made. The only record of my being on the system is the one page summary on Page M-138. This is the page that I have asserted Mr. Dorman fabricated.

Mr. Dorman said on M-138 that I that I had visited his website 539 occasions for a total of 248 hours, 48 minutes, and some 4 seconds. The XXX  HR person wrote the following: “In the last six months Steve has been on the website 560+ hours.” This is a lie  …

The evil “anonymous” blogger Claude Dorman who writes as Will W. W. on his toxic blog, Worcester Wonderland,  and his wife Kunigunde.

These photos were taken earlier in the week, when Dorman, who calls himself Will WW on his blog, had a date with a judge at the Worcester Courthouse. Wife Kunigunde is by his side. Get some therapy, Kunigunde! Leave your deranged husband!

City Councilor at Large candidate Peter Kush is best buds with Claude. He (as “The Count”) posted horrific comments about so many Wusta people/situations on Claude’s Worcester Wonderland blog. Sensing a soul mate, Dorman, writing as Will WW on his “anonymous” blog, urged Kush to run for city council. Kush took his mentor’s advice.

- R. Tirella

Claude Dorman, the Worcester Wonderland blogger (Will WW)

Old Will WW (Claude Dorman of 38 Sever St.) has been inflating his numbers, deflating everyone else’s. Here are portions of Steve’s letter to authorities, re: how Claude manipulated the number of visits Steve made to Claude’s website, Worcester Wonderland. I have deleted the name of Steve’s former employer and made some sentences of Steve’s letter bold. Here is the letter …. – R. Tirella
***************
Dear …

… However, the analysis I have done of the documents provided Monday is devastating to [XXXXX] assertion I was fired because of excess use of the Internet. I am bringing it to your attention so that you know it is with good reason that I ask the Attorney General to order the release of further documents.

The information on the analysis done by [XXXX] on my computer usage (the “XXXX Documents”), shown at Exhibits M-138 through M-150 (faxed you on Tuesday), is misrepresented. I spent only 27 minutes on company time over a two-month period looking at the websites in question.

… In the attached spreadsheet is a detailed analysis of the XXXX Data. Recently XXXX has been advertising my job on the Internet at a greatly reduced pay scale, which I suspect is the real I was discharged.

What Dorman did on the analysis he sent XXXX was to double count my visits to his website. What XXXX did was ignore, or not even investigate, the data provided by Dorman. The data showed I was on the Internet during my lunch break or before work.

We had flexible work hours. We could start at 8:00 AM or 8:30 AM. Most days I would come in prior to 8:30 AM, turn on the computer, check my personal email, and sometimes Dorman’s website, which I monitored to see if Dorman smeared me on his website, as he had done with so many others.

Lunch breaks were also flexible at XXXX. The cafeteria was jammed after noontime, so I would break for lunch between 10:45 AM and 12:00 AM to use the microwave. I believe there was only one microwave available in December.

The spreadsheet analysis was done as follows:

1. In the first tab, entitled “Baseline”, I loaded in the data from exhibits M-138 through M-150. XXXX’s lawyer said they analyzed my visits to two websites: Worcester Magazine and Worcester Wonderland. However, because Dorman bragged about the spyware his website attached to his visitors’ computers, I normally entered his web site via Worcester Magazine, where there is a link to Worcester Wonderland. It’s obvious from the formats and titles that the analysis was done by Mr. Dorman, who mentions in his January 9, 2013 letter that he included a computer analysis with his letter (See M-135).

2. In the second tab entitled “Duplicates”. I highlighted the “News /Media” data in yellow and the Worcester Wonderland data (Dorman’s site) in green. I sorted all the Data by date and time. There were sixty or so identical entries. These showed that eight or nine times in one minute I accessed both sites, which is absurd. I then highlighted in blue the entries that were identical.

3. In the third tab entitled “WW Not Duplicates Sorted by Size” the remaining forty-five green (Worcester Wonderland) entries. Theoretically, these could be entries where I entered the Worcester Wonderland directly. However, as I will show below, it is highly likely that many of these were fraudulent. The data was then sorted by the “Bytes Out” column. As I suspected, much of this data had similar size quantities and measurements. In the tab this data is highlighted in yellow. Sixty percent of this data was of blocks of identical size, with the Bytes Out, Bytes In, and measurements being exactly the same. This strongly suggest, give the statistical size of the universe being analyzed, that the data was either redundant or fraudulently manipulated. Half the forty-five items in this tab were timed during my lunch break or pre-work period.

These facts strongly suggest two conclusions: the analysis submitted was distorted by the fact that I entered the Wonderland website through Worcester Magazine; or Dorman fabricated this study to exaggerate my computer usage. Dorman has been known – which I can prove in court – to fabricate charts and statistics about numerous people and place them on his website. …

I concluded by putting the Worcester Magazine data into the next tab, and extracting out the data where I accessed the website on my own time. This showed that I used the XXXX computer for a grand total of twenty-seven minutes during the two months in question. My analysis here may not be perfect, I may have spent another ten or fifteen minutes on the Worcester Wonderland site than this shows. But it is a lot closer to reality than what XXXX claims about me.

…

Sincerely yours,

Steven R. Maher

By Rosalie Tirella

Just heard the city’s sickest blogger, Claude Dorman of 38 Sever St., Worcester, the unemployed loser who writes the Worcester Wonderland blog, was in court again earlier this week. With local dude and arch nemesis Paulie Collyer. Case was dismissed, but Collyer is going for the big enchilada. He is going to sue Dorman in civil court. Fuck small claims. Paulie is suing Dorman for years of libel and slander and nasty vibes in general. For crying wolf and calling the cops on Paul, for faking terror and trying to get restraining orders against Paulie twice. For making things up … just because Claude is an unemployed loser pushing 60 who has no life, and Paulie is a guy with … pizzazz.

If Paulie wins the big bucks in civil court, he can collect $$$$ from Claude. It is a civil case, so Dorman can be hounded for the $$$, have all sorts of things, like his house, ‘attached.’

We are not lawyers, but ICT writer Steve Maher is, and Steve is also going after Claude and his Wonderland, I call it Wondershit, blog in court. Seems Dorman pulled a Bob Bourassa on poor Steve, wrote a letter to Steve’s employer claiming Steve was a dangerous person and that he was visiting his Worcester Wonderland website during work hours ALL THE TIME and leaving dangerous comments. Seems old Claude’s computer spyware and cookies were working overtime. Seems he traced Steve and traced his employer. (Now do you all want to leave comments on the Wonderland blog?! You would be a masochist, and not very bright, to do so.)

Claude wrote lies to Steve’s employer. Yes, Steve visited his blog during work but not nearly as often as Claude, who blogs as Will WW, claimed. And Steve NEVER LEFT COMMENTS on the Wonderland blog. They were most likely written by Dorman, a mendacious sicko. To spy on Steve, to lie about what he did in a letter to his bosses was not only wrong, but illegal. Slander, libel, lies, you name it. Dorman’s malicious actions caused Steve to be walked off the premises at work and to be fired. FOR DOING NOTHING WRONG. FOR CHECKING CLAUDES BLOG DURING LUNCH AND BEFORE WORK. Claude manipulated the number of visits Steve made to his blog, trippling them.

Why would demented Claude Dorman/Will WW do this? Cost Steve his great job at a Fortune 500 company?

To be evil. To cause pain. (Why does Claude’s wife Cignan stick with her sick husband? Get some therapy Cignan! I beg of you, get help!)

Well, Steve is going after his old company. Then he is setting his sights on Claude Dorman and his Worcester Wonderland blog. He is hoping to get Claude on identity theft, something Claude has done time and time again – for years! – to Billy Randell and me, which we have documented. Writing horrible lies and then attaching other people’s names to your emails, Claude, is illegal! Steve is a lawyer and is building his case. He told me he hopes to land Claude in a jail cell for at least six months.

Can’t our DA do something about this sick, lying miserable fuck?

Can’t Police Chief Gary Gemme sit sick Claude down and set him straight?

Hopefully, Steve will put Wonderland’s sick creator where he belongs … The Worcester County House of Correction.