InCity Feature

...now browsing by category

 

THIS JUST IN! Wyman Gordon site: worst possible site for slots parlor

Wednesday, April 24th, 2013

By Edith Morgan

I am a “Johnny-come-lately” to this discussion of the locating of the slots  at the Wyman-Gordon site.

I have to confess that I believe that this site is the worst possible site for such a business. We have all heard the arguments about the evils of gambling, the encouragement of a deadly habit on the part of those who can ill afford it, and the concomitant crime and degradation which often accompany the establishment of such a facility.  We have also heard the argument that it will bring some quick cash into the city, at a time when it is badly needed. And it will put something in the place of an unused, polluted ugly piece of property.

But let us look carefully at this location: have you all ever driven through Kelly Square, even when it is not rush hour? Many of us have gotten through there on a wing and a prayer, to get to I290, or the Senior Center, the Girls’ Club, or Worcester Academy. I know there are plans to reconfigure this area, but even if traffic is improved, there are so many destinations in that part of our city that will still have to be accessed by that route, that adding traffic from a facility whose sole purpose is to pull coins out of the pockets of visitors is not adding to the improvement of this area.

There HAVE to be better uses of that piece of property: Deb Cary of Mass Audubon has suggested several. And I am sure that the many citizens working on the Canal district projects and the improvements of Green Street’s business improvements have ideas.  Do we really have to sacrifice the Green Island area for a short-term gain of some dubious tax money? Worcester has always been known  as a city of neighborhoods, each with its own distinctive style. Green Island may not be rich in cash, but it is home to much history and ethnic diversity. The present bad times, brought on by the injudicious ( and sometimes even criminal) investment of banks and other greedy entities, cannot last forever, though it should have been over some time ago. 

Let us take the longer view, and not be for sale to the first, or highest bidder. We ought to have learned something from the destruction wrought by the way I290 was allowed to slice right through the city without regard to neighborhoods and businesses, killing the heart of the city, just to get through it fast…

I have been to Foxwoods and Mohegan – both are located way out in the country, away from population centers. They include eating places, hotels, and shopping malls, and are not connected  to the surrounding towns. Both are full-service gambling establishments, offering live entertainment as well as many different kinds of games, not just slot machines… They are basically separate countries, with their own police forces, small Indian nations sitting in the midst of the State of Connecticut. What we are being offered  is a pure and simple mass of slot machines, offering nothing more than just an opportunity to lose money .

Do we really want to sell out our city for such a short gain , sacrifice this area because we have not the foresight to see what this will do to Green Island? Are we really so greedy for some quick tax dollars that we can not see beyond the immediate future? Does money really trump all other values now? And is this the best that our city , the cradle of so much creativity and independent thought, can come up with for this property?

 

Gay Marriage: who makes the rules?

Tuesday, April 23rd, 2013

By Joseph Cancelmo

Who makes the rules? Society says we should do this or that – you grow up, go to school, meet someone you love, date and eventually get married, or move on and repeat the process till you find the “right person.” Mothers have guided daughters, and father their sons. You learn from your mistakes and move on, hoping for the best.

Then came the media and Internet where nothing is sacred, and you see all the shows on Oprah. Back in the day it was the Donahue show … let’s not talk about the Jerry Springer Show. Most recently, the Supreme Court.

You’re living your life like you are supposed to and your children are doing the same, but one day your adult child comes home and has to tell you, or you figured it out, that they prefer same-sex relationships, and not the “conventional Christian” “Boy Girl” kind. So what do you do? There are two options: A. the original Garden of Eden Special – leave in shame and figure it out on your own, or B. the “conventional Christian” option and forgive and move on. Most families pick B.

This being said, you figure out a plan and you live your life the way you want, the way the others have for centuries, only now there is Facebook et al. There are those “Others” who gape and stare and point foul like a bad horror movie of nonconformists and it goes all the way to the Supreme Court and builds like a tsunami and the water never crashes. These very people, gay couples, important tax payers, sometimes known as D.I.N.K.S (Double Income No Kids) watch, listen and read as what appeared to be the Supreme Court regretting taking the case.

In reality, most gay couples who want to marry are not out to destroy the sanctity of marriage; it’s recognition, respecting the values they were taught by loving parents. Why, following the conventional society rules, should they be denied what their parents and other siblings have? Gay people do not choose to be gay; they merely choose to live the truth of who they are, as they were taught by their parents. Click to continue »

Legislature marks Earth Day by advancing ban on plastic bags

Tuesday, April 23rd, 2013

BOSTON – Yesterday – Earth Day – the Legislature’s Environment and Natural Resources Committee held a special hearing on proposals to ban plastic carryout bags. They immediately voted to advance the bill, taking this critical first step. The bill will now move forward and could face a final vote within the next few weeks.

Plastic bags have been singled out as a one of the most visible and dangerous types of litter. The bags take up to 1000 years to degrade, and when they do, they break up into smaller and smaller bits, never going away. They are deadly to wildlife, which mistake them for food or become entangled in them. Turtles, whales, seals, birds, and fish are the most susceptible to ingesting them, suffering a painful death as the plastic wraps around their intestines or they choke to death. Some animal species, already threatened due to issues such as overfishing or habitat loss, could face extinction.

Plastic bags also don’t biodegrade; they simply break into ever smaller plastic bits, never disappearing from our environment. These small bits, known as micro-plastics, attract toxins and carcinogens, which eventually enter the food chain, and displace food supplies in the world’s oceans. Click to continue »

The Green Island meeting on the slots parlor

Saturday, April 20th, 2013

By Sue Moynagh

A meeting was held Monday, April 1, in Green Island, to hear opinions on the proposed Slot Parlor at the Wyman-Gordon site in Worcester. There were approximately 40 people in attendance, including business owners, politicians and stakeholders eager to give their input on this proposal.

Monday’s meeting started out with introductions around the room, and a summary of the proposal was given by Representative John Fresolo. According to Rep. Fresolo, City officials spoke to Richard Friedman of Carpenter & Company, Inc. of Cambridge, Neil Bluhm, Chairman of Rush Street Gaming Company, Gary Carlin, and Steve Lovelette on Wednesday, March 27. There are two parallel proposals: one for a slots parlor and the other for a downtown hotel, both dependent on the other for successful development. The entire project will cost $240 million, $40 million for the hotel, and approximately $200 million for the slot parlor.

The Wyman-Gordon site is one of four possible locations. The developers prefer this site because it is centrally located in the region. Click to continue »

KUDOS, Mike! – InCity Voices: City Council candidate Michael Gaffney on slots/gaming

Thursday, April 18th, 2013

IMPRESSIVE! If only our city councilors took the time to think things out … BRAVE!  Here we have a young man running for public office for the first time and he is taking public stands – stands that may gain him some votes come election time this November – or cost him some votes this fall. Bravo, Mike!!!

Here’s the piece:  - R. Tirella

In my opinion, the City Council must:

By Michael Gaffney, candidate for Worcester city councilor at large

1. Hold up the vote on allowing the City Manager to begin negotiating the host agreement pending receipt of an actual proposal from Rush Street Gaming.

2. Allow the citizens of Worcester to see what the proposal from Rush Street Gaming is before it is sent to the City Manager.

3. Hold public meetings so that the citizens of Worcester can comment on the actual proposal before it is sent to the City Manager.

The City Manager is an unelected official. Why is he doing the negotiations that the City Council should be doing in public? It shows a lack of leadership and underscores why the only option we have for the building site is the casino.

It is my opinion that the casino is a bad idea economically. I don’t want to tell people how to live their lives, but this just seems to be another one of the many home run projects that fail – Union Station (aka largest banquet hall in MA – $500,000+ annual parking garage expense), Arts District (remember me?), Worcester Common Fashion Outlets (progress is now measured by knocking it down.) It will probably be “progress” 10 years from now when we knock the casino down.

Real progress will be slow and measured by how we increase our tax base, but that type of progress can’t be measured in two year election cycles.

**********

AND … On the salaries of City of Worcester employees

The per capita income in Worcester is $24,544; $25,303 District 1, $22,946 District 2, $29,786 District 3, $13,690 District 4, $27,730 District 5. Median income for the City of Worcester is $45,846. The City of Worcester provides the employee wage information via PDF that is not sorted by income and is comprised of over 6757 entries. It would appear that close to 400 city employees make in excess of $100,000. More than half the city employees make more than the per capita income of the residents. How is this equitable or sustainable?

- Michael Gaffney

 

InCity Times Animal Times

Monday, April 15th, 2013

Feeding the Birds

By Deb Young

One of the best ways to enjoy wildlife in the comfort of your home is to watch birds at a feeder.

You’ll be amazed at the variety of birds that will come to your feeder.

Spring feeding, offer fruit, baked and crushed eggshells, and nesting materials, such as human hair, pet fur, bits of string or yarn, and small strips of cloth to help nesting birds. Black sunflower seeds, pinhead oatmeal, soaked sultanas, raisins and currants, mild grated cheese, mealworms, waxworms, mixes for insectivorous birds, good seed mixtures without loose peanuts.

Birds should not be offered many of the foods humans eat such as bread (fresh or stale) it provides no real nutritional value for birds; moldy bread can harm birds

Chocolate: toxic to birds, just as it is to dogs and cats (it contains theobromine); never offer birds any foods containing chocolate or table scraps: some may not be safe or healthy for birds; most table scraps will attract mice or rats.

Birds are most likely to eat where they feel safe from predators. Place feeders twelve feet from a brush pile, evergreen tree, or bush. Birds can quickly fly twelve feet to reach the safe cover, yet predators cannot use it to hide within striking range of the feeder. As further protection, place chicken wire or thorny branches around ground-level feeders.

Many birds will feed at more than one level, but some species have preferences.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

Ground level: mourning doves, sparrows, towhees, and juncos.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      

Table level: cardinals, finches, and jays.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     

Hanging feeders: titmice, goldfinches, and chickadees.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     

Tree trunks: woodpeckers, nuthatches, and wrens

 
How do you choose a birder feeder?
 
Plastic, steel, or glass feeders are easier to clean than are feeders with porous surfaces, such as wood or clay.
 
Small feeders empty quickly, leaving less time for seeds to get wet or spoiled.
Choose feeders with no sharp edges or points; the design should allow birds to perch away from the food to keep it from becoming soiled.
Set up more than one feeder and allow ample space between them to avoid crowding.
Choose a feeder with drainage holes, and add a plastic dome to keep seed dry.
 
Enjoy the company of your wild neighbors in your yard. Every day, more and more wildlife habitat is lost to the spread of development. But you can help wild animals in urban and suburban areas by offering them sanctuary in your own backyard or front yard, roof-top garden, no matter how small.

HOME OF THE BRAVE

Thursday, April 11th, 2013

By Edith Morgan

We all have an opinion about weapons: How many, what type, who should have them, where to use them, etc. Our country is awash in guns, assault weapons, and ammunition. Our movies and television programs extol weapon-wielding “heroes” who are presented to our children as the “good guys.” Many of grew up to believe that these brave heroes solve their (and our) problems by shooting the bad guys and thus making us safe. But do we actually feel safer? Do all the motion detectors, alarms, guns under pillows and in drawers, foot patrols, surveillance cameras, deadbolts, and the myriad other defensive devices really make us feel safer?  How much more “protection will we need to feel safe?

Perhaps our problem lies in our definition of “Safe.” Cowards are always afraid. Brave people much less so. The persons who will go down in history as having accomplished great things and influenced millions to do better, have stood up UNARMED , against well-armed enemies, and won. Think of Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King, Moses, Jesus, Buddha – and numerous others like them.

Much closer to home, we all know real ”heroes and heroines” who took risks , and unarmed, convinced others to follow their better selves.

For example: her home never had a weapon in it; but when a young Nazi lieutenant came to her door in the middle  of the night to arrest her husband, she had the courage to demand to see the paperwork, and asked the name of his commanding officer. The young recruit, unaccustomed to being questioned, retreated to get the paperwork, giving the family time to get help and make plans. That same woman, on vacation in Paris, walked up to a group of young American students in the hotel lobby where she and her husband were staying, and asked them to take their feet off the glass-topped table, then proceeded to lecture them on how to behave as representatives of their mutual country, America. Back home, this remarkable lady, while on her daily walk with her husband, found their way obstructed by a group  of teenagers loitering on the corner. She marched up to the group and asked them to make way on the public sidewalk so she and her husband could pass. Miraculously, they did. That woman was my mother – who saved our family many times during the difficult days of WW II.

If we look around our neighborhood, I think we could find people who display that kind of bravery every day: parents, teachers, friends, neighbors – who stand up for what is right, armed only with the courage of their convictions, They should be the real heroes to whom we pay homage. And sometimes, we are smart enough to elect such a person to represent us – a person who speaks truth to power again and again, does not enrich himself at our expense, and bravely forges on despite the odds.

 

 

Think your animals are safe in your backyard? Think again!

Thursday, April 11th, 2013

By Martin Mersereau

 Dogs have been disappearing in Idaho. One dog, named Bean, was found shot dead and left near a canal. A hiker found another dog in a canyon, covered with a sheet and apparently beaten to death. Two other dogs, Gauge and Mac, went missing and were later found shot to death on a neighbor’s property. Two dogs were believed to have been abducted from a fenced backyard. A small dog who was let outside to relieve himself hasn’t been seen since. Rumors are swirling that dozens of other missing dogs may have been abducted, shot or used as “bait” in dogfighting rings.

 

If your animal companions are snoozing at your feet or curled up on your lap right now, good. But if they’re outside alone, don’t keep reading—go get them. As the Idaho residents whose dogs have disappeared or been killed have learned the hard way, leaving animals outdoors unattended—even for “just a minute” in a fenced yard—is irresponsible and an invitation to tragedy.

 

We all want to believe that our neighborhoods are safe, but in my work, I have seen that every community is full of dangers for dogs and cats. Most of the 400-plus cruelty cases that PETA receives weekly involve animals who were victimized while outside unsupervised. In Volusia County, Fla., for example, a cat who usually roamed the neighborhood at night was found one morning sliced in two. The front half of his body was in his owner’s backyard, and his intestines were in the front yard.

 

Friendly cats and dogs are also the favored victims of bunchers—people who cruise neighborhoods, picking up animals in order to sell them to laboratories for experiments—and dogfighters looking for free “bait” to train dogs to attack. In Buchanan, Ga., two dogs who were kept outdoors on chains were believed to have been abducted by a neighbor and used as dogfighting “bait.” One dog was returned paralyzed, and the other was found dead on a neighbor’s lawn.

 

It’s also not unusual for cruel neighbors with short fuses to take matters into their own hands. In Enola, Pa., a cat who was allowed to roam went missing. Five days later, the cat’s owner discovered him dead in her trashcan. A neighbor had previously warned her that he was sick of her cat using his yard as a litterbox.

 

In Frenchtown Charter Township, Mich., a man pleaded no contest to attempted animal killing or torture for leaving out meat spiked with sharp objects to stop a neighbor’s dog from coming onto his property. The dog, named Jinx, ate the meat and had to be euthanized because of his injuries. There is no excuse for harming animals—and animal abusers must be prosecuted—but people who leave their animal companions outdoors unattended share in the blame when their animals meet gruesome fates.

 

Cruel people aren’t the only dangers lurking outdoors. Every day, animals are injured or killed in traffic, poisoned and attacked by other animals. Chained dogs are especially vulnerable because they have no way to escape from aggressive roaming animals.

 

Just as responsible parents would never let their 2-year-old wander freely around the neighborhood, we shouldn’t leave our animals to take their chances outdoors, either. We can keep our animal companions safe by keeping them indoors and allowing them outdoors only on a harness and leash, under our constant watchful eye. That way, we’ll never have to wonder whether our animals are safe, and we won’t ever be haunted by the regret of having allowed something terrible to happen because we failed to protect them.

 

Walking in Worcester

Tuesday, April 9th, 2013

By Sue Moynagh

This is a car- driving society, and non- drivers seem few and far between, but we are here and I would like to tell you what it is like to make your way in Worcester without a car. First I would like to explain that there are various reasons why people don’t drive. Many choose not to own a car because they are too expensive to own and operate. Some prefer not to drive because they respect the environment. Walking for them provides health benefits and does not pollute. Many of these individuals also own bicycles for longer distances. Some people cannot drive a car for health reasons. It is hard to drive if you cannot see clearly or if your body cannot react fast enough to maneuver a vehicle through heavy traffic. And yes, there are people who would like to be driving but have lost their licenses. So how do we get around? I would like to relate my own experiences to show how challenging it is when you don’t drive.

Urban layout is much different than when I was a youngster. Then, everything was pretty much within walking distance. Now, with suburban and exurban sprawl, nothing is localized anymore. Most people look confused when I say I don’t drive a car. They can’t believe that in this day and age, some people have to rely on other forms of transportation. If you don’t drive, they ask, how do you function? Well, if you don’t drive, you have several options: take the bus, take a cab, ask for rides or walk.

It is not always easy being a non- driver in Worcester. It can be challenging but also rewarding to plan your daily activities to be efficient and effective without a car. Drivers also have to schedule shopping trips, work, medical and business visits, and social functions, but they also get more done than non- drivers do. I would say that a driver can do all of my weekly errands in one day or maybe two. My first step is to list what I have to accomplish during the week. I need to shop for food, pet supplies and household items. I may have a medical appointment that week or a number of meetings scheduled that I must attend. When I worked, and I hope to soon, these necessary chores usually had to wait for weekends or evening hours. Then you have to know what the weather is going to be like in the next few days. Major storms mean fewer days in which to get things done. Most important of all, I have to determine how will I get to these places? Do I need to ask for a ride? Check bus schedules?

Just as a driver tries to fit as many errands in during one drive, I have to get as much done during one day’s excursion. If I have a Weight Watcher’s Meeting on Thursday morning, I can walk to the Worcester shop (it takes approximately 50 minutes). Then I can shop at Walmart or take the bus to Blackstone Shoppes to get to PetSmart for pet supplies. If necessary, I can walk or take the bus down Greenwood Street to the Plaza. There I can do banking, shop for clothes and food, and stop in the bakery. If the purchases are light, I can walk home (one and a half hours). If I buy a lot of canned goods, I take the bus. The same goes for medical visits. If I go to the optometrist downtown, I try to arrange the time to fit in any business that has to be taken care of, such as banking or prescription pickup. Sometimes I catch the bus to Auburn mall, do some shopping, and then catch the bus home. This has to be carefully timed and orchestrated. If you miss the bus, there may be a long wait. If it was the last bus, you either walk or call a cab.

Bus service has improved somewhat in the past few years. Most bus drivers are friendly and courteous, although one or two could use an attitude change. There is even a way to track buses en route with your smart phone or telephone. If you call 508-296-TRAK (8725), and give the operator the name or number of the bus stop, you can find out when the bus will arrive. Buses are usually on time or close to schedule, unless the weather is very bad or there is a bus that breaks down and has to be replaced. There are issues with bus service, usually involving schedules and transfers.

Schedules for some routes change about three times a year. Sometimes the route itself changes as it did a few years ago, when the number 4 bus no longer stopped at Crompton Park, but rather continued to the Plaza at the end of Greenwood Street. Then it changed again, to go to Walmart and then to the Blackstone Shoppes in Millbury. Great for me, but many people who were not aware of the change went for an extra ride, and most were very angry about this waste of their time. Transfers can be a problem, however, because some buses only run once an hour. If you can’t make the transfer, there is an hour wait, not fun if you have frozen foods in your shopping bag and the temperature is 90˚. The long wait between buses is not fun if you have to stand in rain, snow or wind and there is no shelter. Most drivers are aware of their stops, even if signs are missing, but on occasion, the bus driver has gone by. Sometimes stops are eliminated altogether. For instance, the Green Street bus stops near Ash Street were eliminated, so now I have to walk either to Kelley Square or near Temple Street. This is no big deal when I catch the bus empty- handed, but a nightmare when I have twenty to thirty pounds of groceries in my bags and have extra blocks to walk, plus the Harrison Street hill. This occurs about two or three times a week. I swear my arms are getting longer from lugging those bags.

Recently, there was a meeting discussing bus service times. Service ends early for some routes, and those who have to get to jobs or return home late at night are having difficulty dealing with keeping work. There are also concerns with the new bus Hub near Union Station. How will this affect the few businesses downtown? It is more convenient for people taking the out of town buses or trains, but what about downtown workers? I know I have had to pass up good job opportunities because there was no bus service at nights or on weekends.

I very seldom ask people for rides, but I will accept a ride if offered at night or I have a lot of heavy items to carry. I am very grateful to those who take the time to give me a ride. I try to offer money for gasoline, or I may treat them to a coffee or even a meal to say thank you. Most of these people are kind and gracious, even offering to help me with my bags. However, some people feel that they have a right to interfere in your personal business because they are doing you a favor. I have had to put up with rude and intrusive comments and questions during rides because I felt at the mercy of these people. I have had to endure “advice” about my ratty hair, my weight problem, my education choices, my home life, and best of all, the inevitable, “did it ever occur to you to learn how to drive so that you don’t have to bother people for rides?” How do you tell someone to mind their own business when you’re halfway to another town with a carrier occupied by a howling, terrified animal who has to get to the vet? You shut up and feel your blood pressure go up. Now I take cabs to get to the vet.

Cab service in Worcester is great, but I seldom take cabs because of income limitations. Cabs are an option if I have to be somewhere very early in the morning before buses run, or if I have too many heavy items to carry home. And of course, vet trips are easier in a taxi.

I saved the best for last: walking. I love to walk. Anyone who knows me is aware that I have been fighting the battle of the bulge for a number of years now, and I often walk just for exercise. There are numerous challenges for the pedestrian. There are safety issues, of course, and you have to be aware of your surroundings, especially in the evening. Weather is a big factor. Walking on a nice spring or fall day can be relaxing and delightful, but summer heat and winter ice can be dangerous. Winter snow is beautiful, but trying to stay on sidewalks when one homeowner shovels and the other doesn’t can be a pain. I hate walking in the streets, especially when it is slippery. Some areas are seldom if ever shoveled, such as the McKeon Road extension leading to Walmart, or around the Green Street bridge. But that is not the worse problem for walkers

Many drivers, for some reason, have given up stopping at intersections for red lights. I cannot even count the number of near- misses I have had when some idiot refused to stop at a crosswalk. I know drivers will protest that pedestrians often jump from out of nowhere in front of their moving vehicle, forcing them to slam on the brakes. I do not excuse the pedestrian’s behavior, but my concern is with people who are actually trying to cross streets according to the law. I am frustrated when the light shows “walk” and I have to wait for a line of cars to go by me.

There are ways to get around Worcester, and surrounding towns, without driving a car. It takes creativity and careful planning for the non- driver, but it can be done. I hope those who work in city planning or transportation remember that we are a presence in the city. If Worcester wants to be “pedestrian friendly,” these people have to make sure our needs for safety, ease and efficiency in movement are met, so that we can continue to live, enjoy and get around this city.

 

 

Re: Worcester Wonderland blogger = Claude Dorman (writing as Will WW) filing false police reports

Tuesday, April 2nd, 2013

Claude Dorman, the Worcester Wonderland blogger (Will WW), leaving the Worcester courthouse last month.

Claude (Will WW) filed two (TWO!) reports with the Worcester Police Dept. on Steve, a man he has never met, a man who has never caused Claude any harm, a man for whom Cluade created CRIMES. False, false, false. Here is a portion of Steve’s letter to the attorney general’s office re: Claude Dorman (Will WW) of 38 Sever St., Worcester. I have made some sentences bold.   – R. Tirella:

  1. In the redacted letter of January 9, 2013 shown at M-135 the blogmaster wrote: “I have filed two incident reports with the police.” I believe this is directly related to question of my discharge. I would like copies of any police reports [XXXX] has in their possession regarding this information.

 

  1. In his letter to you, [XXXX] stated: “However, the IT Department did have such documents and provided them once this letter was received and a search was done to ensure all responsive documents were produced.” If I have not been given ALL the IT documents in [XXX]’s possession, I would like [XXXX] to state that in writing. If they have other documents I should be sent copies.

 

  1. Chapter 149 Section 52C contains a loosely written phrase that a personnel file must include “any other documents relating to disciplinary action regarding the employee.”
  2. Unfortunately, the state legislature did not define what “documents’ meant in this context. Nor does the Code of Massachusetts Regulations. I could not find any advisory on the Attorney General’s web site.

The central focus in this matter is my use of the company computer. That was the basis of the decision to discharge me and suspend me. I would therefore like to narrow the focus to those relevant emails can be retrieved at the least expense of time to [XXX]. I would like to request that {XXX] provided the following:

  1. Copies of emails to [XX] and [XX] from the IT department on the investigation.

 

  1. Copies of emails from the IT department to the HR representatives present where I was suspended.

 

  1. Copies of the emails between [XXX] and [XXX] discussing the decision to suspend and terminate me. This are key documents regarding my discharge and ultimately were the records on which the decision was made.

 

I request that [XXX] submit an evidence log, listing all the files above it has, which ones were released, and their grounds for not releasing them

Thank you! I am attaching list of the documents in this letter, in the event you want to send it to [XXX] asking them the documents to me.

Sincerely yours,

**********

DOCUMENTS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IS ORDERED TO BE RELEASED BY [XXXXX]  TO STEVEN R. MAHER.

 

  1. Internally produced [XXX] studies, which evaluate the allegations by Mr. Dorman, be they written or electronic.

 

  1. Identify the HR representative who wrote the handwritten notes on M-151 and M-152 and the date they were written.

 

  1. Any police reports [XXX] has in their possession regarding Steven R. Maher.

 …