38 Sever St.

… Bill Randell could use this letter! … Billy, or anyone in town, PLEASE feel free to print out and USE! Mail this letter out to Claude Dorman (Wonderland blogger) 38 Sever St., Worcester, MA 01609. If Dorman has enough folks taking him to court, mailing out lets to the DA, he may have to continue to hire his lawyer – some guy from Spencer that Paul Collyer says looks like a mob guy – to defend him. Let’s make Dorman, a notorious cheap-skate, spend $$$. – “Rose”

Here is the letter:

District Attorney Joseph. E. Early
225 Main Street
Worcester, MA 01608

Police Chief Gary Gemme
9-11 Lincoln Square
Worcester, MA 01608

Dear Sirs:

Recently a Worcester man used, without my permission, my business email address to send out emails in my name to a number of Worcester city officials. I believe that the individual who did this was Claude Dorman of 38 Sever St., Worcester, MA.

This is not the first time Mr. Dorman has used my business email to send out negative email about me. I have consulted with an attorney and have been advised that Mr. Dorman has violated Mass. Gen. L. c. 266 Section 37E regarding identity fraud. This statute defines “pose” in the context of identity crime as “to falsely represent oneself, either directly or indirectly, as another person or persons.”

Mr. Dorman in doing this has caused me both financial and emotional harm. I request that me Dorman be charged with violating Mass. Gen. L. c. 266 Section 37E.

Sincerely yours,

name

CC: Claude Dorman
**************

Claude Dorman, outside the Worcester Courthouse this past March. It was Dorman vs. Paulie Collyer.

Claude Dorman, the Worcester Wonderland blogger (Will WW), leaving the Worcester courthouse last month.

Claude (Will WW) filed two (TWO!) reports with the Worcester Police Dept. on Steve, a man he has never met, a man who has never caused Claude any harm, a man for whom Cluade created CRIMES. False, false, false. Here is a portion of Steve’s letter to the attorney general’s office re: Claude Dorman (Will WW) of 38 Sever St., Worcester. I have made some sentences bold.   – R. Tirella:

1. In the redacted letter of January 9, 2013 shown at M-135 the blogmaster wrote: “I have filed two incident reports with the police.” I believe this is directly related to question of my discharge. I would like copies of any police reports [XXXX] has in their possession regarding this information.

1. In his letter to you, [XXXX] stated: “However, the IT Department did have such documents and provided them once this letter was received and a search was done to ensure all responsive documents were produced.” If I have not been given ALL the IT documents in [XXX]’s possession, I would like [XXXX] to state that in writing. If they have other documents I should be sent copies.

1. Chapter 149 Section 52C contains a loosely written phrase that a personnel file must include “any other documents relating to disciplinary action regarding the employee.”

Unfortunately, the state legislature did not define what “documents’ meant in this context. Nor does the Code of Massachusetts Regulations. I could not find any advisory on the Attorney General’s web site.

The central focus in this matter is my use of the company computer. That was the basis of the decision to discharge me and suspend me. I would therefore like to narrow the focus to those relevant emails can be retrieved at the least expense of time to [XXX]. I would like to request that {XXX] provided the following:

1. Copies of emails to [XX] and [XX] from the IT department on the investigation.

1. Copies of emails from the IT department to the HR representatives present where I was suspended.

1. Copies of the emails between [XXX] and [XXX] discussing the decision to suspend and terminate me. This are key documents regarding my discharge and ultimately were the records on which the decision was made.

I request that [XXX] submit an evidence log, listing all the files above it has, which ones were released, and their grounds for not releasing them

Thank you! I am attaching list of the documents in this letter, in the event you want to send it to [XXX] asking them the documents to me.

Sincerely yours,

**********

DOCUMENTS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IS ORDERED TO BE RELEASED BY [XXXXX]  TO STEVEN R. MAHER.

1. Internally produced [XXX] studies, which evaluate the allegations by Mr. Dorman, be they written or electronic.

1. Identify the HR representative who wrote the handwritten notes on M-151 and M-152 and the date they were written.

1. Any police reports [XXX] has in their possession regarding Steven R. Maher.

 …

editor’s note: How sick is Claude Dorman, the author of the Worcester Wonderland blog? Pretty sick. Dorman, who lives at 38 Sever St., Worcester, with his wife Kunigunde, didn’t like Steve visiting his website. So he went to the police and filed two police reports on Steve. Then he sent spread sheets, paper work galore re: Steve, trumped up charges, to Steve’s employer. Lies, lies, lies. Readers of Worcester Wonderland blog, where Dorman writes as the “anonymous” blogger Will W. W.,  PLEASE beware! You could be Dorman’s next victim! He wants to ruin people’s lives.

Here is a portion of the letter Steve sent to the attroney general’s office, re: Claude Dorman/Will W. W.. I have deleted his employer’s name and its attorney’s name, also the attorney general contact person’s name.  I have made some sentences bold. – R. Tirella 

***********************

Dear XXXX:

I received last night the response from XXXX Counsel XXXX. I am not wholly satisfied with the response. I received the following:

A letter dated January 9, 20013 from the “blogmaster” of the Worcester Wonderland website. (See M-135 attached.) I understand the blogmaster is Claude Dorman. I will presume it was his name that was redacted, and will reference him below.

Two sheets containing threats against Claude Dorman. These sheets do not contain any information linking me (such as an IP address) to these threats. (See attached M-136 and M-137.) XXX stated XXXX could not substantiate these threats.

What looks like a one page summary of five days in December 2013 (See M-138). Why this appears in a different format from the rest of the documents provided was not explained. I will state below why I believed this is a falsified document.

A thirteen page report on my access to the Worcester Wonderland website for December 2012. This does not look like a report generated from a reporting package. It looks like a spreadsheet printout. I believe it is possible Mr. Dorman downloaded this information and then falsified the spreadsheet by copying entries to other lines. (See M-139 through M-150).

Two pages of handwritten notes from an unidentified XXXX  person. (See M-151-M-152).

These documents raise a number of questions:

The complaint by Mr. Dorman dated January 9, 2013 references the report attached at M-139 through M-150. Yet if you look at M-148 through M-150 you see almost three pages of data dated after January 9, 2013. This is evidence that Mr. Dorman in fact fabricated this report, unless he has a time travel machine allowing him to go weeks ahead into the future to bring back to the past documents for his January 9, 2013 complaint.

This reports shows that much of the time I spent on this website were before the workday began, during my lunch period, or after work. This was not in violation of XXXX policy. To a large degree, this is exculpatory evidence for me, not XXXX. Additionally, most of the Internet visits were doing non-peak days of the month …

Mr. Dorman claims receiving threats from me on December 27, 2012 and December 31, 2012. (See M-136d M-137 Yet if you look at the report on pages M-139 through M-150 I was not logged on to the website at the time the alleged threats were made. The only record of my being on the system is the one page summary on Page M-138. This is the page that I have asserted Mr. Dorman fabricated.

Mr. Dorman said on M-138 that I that I had visited his website 539 occasions for a total of 248 hours, 48 minutes, and some 4 seconds. The XXX  HR person wrote the following: “In the last six months Steve has been on the website 560+ hours.” This is a lie  …

The evil “anonymous” blogger Claude Dorman who writes as Will W. W. on his toxic blog, Worcester Wonderland,  and his wife Kunigunde.

Claude Dorman, the Worcester Wonderland blogger (Will WW)

Old Will WW (Claude Dorman of 38 Sever St.) has been inflating his numbers, deflating everyone else’s. Here are portions of Steve’s letter to authorities, re: how Claude manipulated the number of visits Steve made to Claude’s website, Worcester Wonderland. I have deleted the name of Steve’s former employer and made some sentences of Steve’s letter bold. Here is the letter …. – R. Tirella
***************
Dear …

… However, the analysis I have done of the documents provided Monday is devastating to [XXXXX] assertion I was fired because of excess use of the Internet. I am bringing it to your attention so that you know it is with good reason that I ask the Attorney General to order the release of further documents.

The information on the analysis done by [XXXX] on my computer usage (the “XXXX Documents”), shown at Exhibits M-138 through M-150 (faxed you on Tuesday), is misrepresented. I spent only 27 minutes on company time over a two-month period looking at the websites in question.

… In the attached spreadsheet is a detailed analysis of the XXXX Data. Recently XXXX has been advertising my job on the Internet at a greatly reduced pay scale, which I suspect is the real I was discharged.

What Dorman did on the analysis he sent XXXX was to double count my visits to his website. What XXXX did was ignore, or not even investigate, the data provided by Dorman. The data showed I was on the Internet during my lunch break or before work.

We had flexible work hours. We could start at 8:00 AM or 8:30 AM. Most days I would come in prior to 8:30 AM, turn on the computer, check my personal email, and sometimes Dorman’s website, which I monitored to see if Dorman smeared me on his website, as he had done with so many others.

Lunch breaks were also flexible at XXXX. The cafeteria was jammed after noontime, so I would break for lunch between 10:45 AM and 12:00 AM to use the microwave. I believe there was only one microwave available in December.

The spreadsheet analysis was done as follows:

1. In the first tab, entitled “Baseline”, I loaded in the data from exhibits M-138 through M-150. XXXX’s lawyer said they analyzed my visits to two websites: Worcester Magazine and Worcester Wonderland. However, because Dorman bragged about the spyware his website attached to his visitors’ computers, I normally entered his web site via Worcester Magazine, where there is a link to Worcester Wonderland. It’s obvious from the formats and titles that the analysis was done by Mr. Dorman, who mentions in his January 9, 2013 letter that he included a computer analysis with his letter (See M-135).

2. In the second tab entitled “Duplicates”. I highlighted the “News /Media” data in yellow and the Worcester Wonderland data (Dorman’s site) in green. I sorted all the Data by date and time. There were sixty or so identical entries. These showed that eight or nine times in one minute I accessed both sites, which is absurd. I then highlighted in blue the entries that were identical.

3. In the third tab entitled “WW Not Duplicates Sorted by Size” the remaining forty-five green (Worcester Wonderland) entries. Theoretically, these could be entries where I entered the Worcester Wonderland directly. However, as I will show below, it is highly likely that many of these were fraudulent. The data was then sorted by the “Bytes Out” column. As I suspected, much of this data had similar size quantities and measurements. In the tab this data is highlighted in yellow. Sixty percent of this data was of blocks of identical size, with the Bytes Out, Bytes In, and measurements being exactly the same. This strongly suggest, give the statistical size of the universe being analyzed, that the data was either redundant or fraudulently manipulated. Half the forty-five items in this tab were timed during my lunch break or pre-work period.

These facts strongly suggest two conclusions: the analysis submitted was distorted by the fact that I entered the Wonderland website through Worcester Magazine; or Dorman fabricated this study to exaggerate my computer usage. Dorman has been known – which I can prove in court – to fabricate charts and statistics about numerous people and place them on his website. …

I concluded by putting the Worcester Magazine data into the next tab, and extracting out the data where I accessed the website on my own time. This showed that I used the XXXX computer for a grand total of twenty-seven minutes during the two months in question. My analysis here may not be perfect, I may have spent another ten or fifteen minutes on the Worcester Wonderland site than this shows. But it is a lot closer to reality than what XXXX claims about me.

…

Sincerely yours,

Steven R. Maher

CLAUDE DORMAN, Worcester Wonderland blogger (Will WW)

please click on link below to see the dorman mobile:

http://claudepdorman-worcesterwonderlandetal.blogspot.com/2012/04/i-drive-saab-what-do-you-drive.html

For years! years! Claude Dorman, Worcester Wonderland blogger (WIll WW) has lied about my paper’s circulation, web stats, my age, even my beliefs.

A pal said, the guy is a fraud. Check out his cars. They most likely are not registered in Worcester. Which means Claude Dorman of 38 Sever St. Worcester, MA 01609, and his wife Kunigunde Cigan, are NOT PAYING THEIR CAR EXCISE TAXES TO Worcester but another MA town … which means Worcester isn’t getting the Dormans’ tax dollars and the Dormans are saving a bundle of money in car insurance premiums by registering their Saabs out of the city! Illegal! If true, Claude and his wife are GUILTY OF INSURANCE FRAUD.

Did some research and low and behold my pal was right! Dorman’s and Cigan’s Saabs are BOTH registered in MARLBORO, Massachusetts! (to save some serious insurance premium $$$bucks, for sure!)

Yup! We checked it out: The Dorman Saab with licence plate # 69K N14 is registerd under “Kunigunde Dorman” in MARLBORO, Ma.

Claude’s Saaab – the one with licence plate # 93YY12 is registered under his name, Claude Dorman, in Marlboro, Ma.

Don’t worry, Claude, I’ve alerted the authorities.

- R. Tirella

******************

Comments:

1. SAABrina the Witch
   
   
   This is absolutely priceless! Excellent detective work, Rose! The same buffoon who has lampooned small business people of Worcester on his blog as ‘liars, crooks and cheats’ and the same buffoon who requests tax abatements on a villa in the hood is CHEATING Worcester out of excise tax money and DEFRAUDING insurance companies claiming a Marlboro residence. You just can’t make this stuff up … welcome to Wusta! Dime his ass out, Rose! 

2. Kunigunde Golemo
   
   
   Having found this little tidbit on Worcester Wonderland aka Claude Dorman, make sure when dropping the dime on him to state he has been a Worcester resident since 8/31/1999 so Claude and Cigan’s little tax evasion/insurance fraud has been going on for a loooooooooong time …. make sure you get paid on the WHOLE total of the insurance fraud. Also the Dorman’s took their house off of the market on 10/11/2012. 

Worcester Wonderland blogger (Will WW) is really uber nerd Claude Dorman of 38 Sever St., Worcester.  Here he is – the tall one wearing the mommy jeans.

A few days ago Jeff and I went down to the Worcester Courthouse for me to file harassment papers against old Claude Dorman of 38 Sever St.. You know, the Worcester Wonderland blogger (aka Will WW) nut job who hates everybody. Well, seems the lady clerks know all about Claude. They nodded, looked at each other and said: “Claude Dorman” after we said what I wanted to do.

They, like most of Worcester, know the guy who thought he could blog his garbage and never suffer the consequences. Well, he was outed by me and some other folks and is angry that the veil has been lifted. Now we can add another name to the Claude Sucks list: Jeff. For several years he’s heard me whining about nutjob Dorman. We no longer go out but are good friends; so he still gets the reports. He knows that after being outed,  Claude Dorman has decided to: sell his home, change his phone number, change the way he writes his blog (no more touchy feely personal stuff or posts about antique jaunts), change his life. Good for us! We hope he moves back to the Marlboro area!

Now Jeff is in the mix. Good for me, not so good for Claude who, if he publishes one comma about Jeff, will find himself facing off against a formidable foe (and I will be sure to show Jeff any Claude post relating to him. He’s a contractor/biz guy who has no patience for Claude’s bull and will sue him to the max. Heck, Jeff can make as much $$$ on one job as  Claude or his wife make in a year, so he can afford court costs.)

So a few days ago we  hopped into Jeff’s car and went to Main Street. Of course, if this were 1850 you’d look at Jeff and see … a tough Injun fighter. Long hair waving in the wind, wiry, muscular body from all his contractor work, strong … he is the antithesis of Claude/Will WW. Drop Jeff in the mid-19th century and you get Clint Eastwood in Unforgiven. Drop Dorman in the Wild West and you get coyote scraps. He’s lucky he lives in 2012. A hideous nerd like Dorman, 57, couldn’t survive in any other century but this Face Book, Internet, nerd-loving one.

But don’t worry Claude, we are going about this legally! Through the courts. You don’t need to cry wolf at the police station, etc, like you did with Paul Collyer, a guy you harassed and are in no way afraid of.  A guy you have dragged through the court system, where your case was thrown out by the judge.

Everyone gets your games, Claude. Even the lady clerks at the Worcester Courthouse.

- R. Tirella

… plays games with Googleanalytics. Each user creates his/her password to get into his/her google analytics account. That is not my account! Claude made up a new one or … did something nefarious. This week a gal pal is DRIVING ME to the Worcester Courthouse, walking in with me and standing by me as I fill out the harassment order.

Enough is enough, she said.

Oh, and for the curious: Claude, who lives on 38 sever St., has not sold his house for the inflated price he wants. Wonder why? Some crime stats for his neighborhood:

Claude Dorman/Worcester Wonderland blogger’s (Will WW) neighborhood crime stats:

Jul 4, 2012 – Luis E. Andino, 46, of 54 Sever St., Worcester, charged with trespassing, possession of cocaine and resisting arrest

Apr 19, 2012 – Jonathan Cummings, 19, of 61 Sever St., Worcester, charged with larceny over $250

Jun 25, 2012 – Marvin Gonzalez, 31, of 11 Sever St., Worcester, charged with assault and battery

May 7, 2012 – Isaac Gyamera, 45, of 11 Sever St., Worcester, charged with driving without a license

May 1, 2012 – Jonathan J. Ramos Jr., 24, of 12 Sever St., Worcester, charged with driving with a suspended license

May 25, 2012 – Madeline Santiago, 22, of 10 Sever St., Worcester, charged with assault and battery and assault and battery with a dangerous weapon

Mar 19, 2012 – Isaac Muturi Njoroge, 49, of 11 Sever St., Worcester, charged with paying for sexual conduct

Apr 5, 2012 – Eric K. Amankrah, 41, of 11 Sever St., Worcester, charged with driving an uninsured vehicle

Jan 26, 2012 – Jonathan Cummings, 19, of 61 Sever St., Worcester, charged with larceny over $250

Nov 8, 2011 – Marcell May, 20, of 12 Sever St., Worcester, charged with armed robbery (handgun), kidnapping, assault and battery with a dangerous weapon

Sep 22, 2011 – Dennis A. Greene, 54, 26 Sever St., Apt. 2R, Worcester, charged with assault and battery

Jul 19, 2011 – Wanda Cuadrado, 42, of 10 Sever St., Apt. 2, Worcester, charged with assault and battery with a dangerous weapon (razor blade)

Jan 26, 2012 – Jonathan Cummings, 19, of 61 Sever St., Worcester, charged with larceny over $250
****************************
Why can’t Claude-o worry about the important things in life?? To learn ALL ABOUT CLAUDE DORMAN, THE WORCESTER WONDERLAND BLOGGER (Will WW), check out this website:

http://claudepdorman-worcesterwonderlandetal.blogspot.com/

R. Tirella

By Rosalie Tirella

The Worcester Wonderland blogger Claude Dorman, who lives goes by the fake name “Will WW” on his blog and lives at 38 Sever St., has faked fear of good egg Paulie Collyer. So much so that they are facing each other in court again tomorrow. Claude has taken another restraining order out against Paulie.

Utter lies on Dorman’s part. If he is so terrified of Paulie, why then has this court case been continued to early autumn (TODAY, Friday, Sept. 7, 9 a.m., Worcester Courthouse)?

Why haven’t the Worcester police stepped in earlier?

And why is Dorman, a toxic man who has faced court over his website Worcester Wonderland before (he blogs as Will WW), why all of a sudden is he filled with trepidation and whining about harassment?

Utter fakery!

Is it because you think, Claude-o, that you can hide behind a nom de plume and post lies on your website about people, defaming them and their businesses? Ruining people’s lives (like poor Bob Bourassa’s) …. and then all of a sudden it is wrong to out you? You – a very public person?

That’s right, Dorman. YOU have been in the public sphere for years! Tomorrow, please don’t lie in a court of law!

The proof is there! You have/had publicly:

1. joined a Worcester neighborhood group, Elm Park Prep. During that time, you had worked with former Worcester District 4 City Councilor, Barbara Haller.

2. You have been at meetings of this group.

3. You have represented your neighborhood in dealings with the city of Worcester.

4. You have represented your neighborhood in dealings with Becker College, the school located directly across the street from your home. In fact, the Becker College news letter has a story and photo of YOU and your group working with the college and its students to repaint parking spots/lines near your home.

5. You have been to city council meetings numerouse times re: taxes on your house.

In short, Cluade-o, you have never been shy of participating in the public sphere.

So your argument, tomorrow, is an utter lie.

And you fear no one. YOu are just using the Worcester police force and the Worcester courts as a way to defame and hurt and harass people you loathe.

Wake up, Worcester Wonderland blogger Claude Dorman! Your pen name Will WW in no way masks the creep you are.

Toxic Worcester Wonderland blogger Claude Dorman of 38 Sever St., Worcester, has lost it. Utter lies about costs for ICTimes ads. Pay my bills through my biz. Couldn’t do that if I charged Claude’s ad rates. Lies about our distribution, too. Lies about our webstats (We use Googleanalytics and they tell us we have more than 2,5oo website readers.) Not to worry, kiddos! The Worcester Wonderland blogger Dorman has two visits to make to the Worcester Courthouse in a few weeks … . We think the honorable Judge LoConto has had enough of Wonderland’s bull shit and will lay down the law for old Claude.

Here, in case you missed it, is a blog that turns Worcester Wonderland/Claude Dorman on his nerdy head.

You’re 57 years old, Claudo, and unemployed! Get a life!

We will report the court proceedings here. Stay tuned!  Now for the Claude/Worcester Wonderland alter ego blog:

http://claudepdorman-worcesterwonderlandetal.blogspot.com/

- R. Tirella

Called my lawyer today about Claude Dorman who is the  Worcester Wonderland blogger (38 Sever St., Worcester). Told him of Dorman’s latest crime.

My lawyer just called me back. Said to take none of Claude’s cyber-bullying. He told me Claude Dorman has stolen my identity and to go to the Worcester Courthouse tomorrow (after we put latest ICT to bed) and take out a harassment order against Claude.

Won’t cost me a dime.

SO: Another day in court for Claude Dorman, Worcester Wonderland bogger, aka Will WW, 38 Sever St., Worcester, MA.

This guy is truly sick/toxic.

- R. Tirella