City Council

...now browsing by tag

 
 

KUDOS, Mike! – InCity Voices: City Council candidate Michael Gaffney on slots/gaming

Thursday, April 18th, 2013

IMPRESSIVE! If only our city councilors took the time to think things out … BRAVE!  Here we have a young man running for public office for the first time and he is taking public stands – stands that may gain him some votes come election time this November – or cost him some votes this fall. Bravo, Mike!!!

Here’s the piece:  - R. Tirella

In my opinion, the City Council must:

By Michael Gaffney, candidate for Worcester city councilor at large

1. Hold up the vote on allowing the City Manager to begin negotiating the host agreement pending receipt of an actual proposal from Rush Street Gaming.

2. Allow the citizens of Worcester to see what the proposal from Rush Street Gaming is before it is sent to the City Manager.

3. Hold public meetings so that the citizens of Worcester can comment on the actual proposal before it is sent to the City Manager.

The City Manager is an unelected official. Why is he doing the negotiations that the City Council should be doing in public? It shows a lack of leadership and underscores why the only option we have for the building site is the casino.

It is my opinion that the casino is a bad idea economically. I don’t want to tell people how to live their lives, but this just seems to be another one of the many home run projects that fail – Union Station (aka largest banquet hall in MA – $500,000+ annual parking garage expense), Arts District (remember me?), Worcester Common Fashion Outlets (progress is now measured by knocking it down.) It will probably be “progress” 10 years from now when we knock the casino down.

Real progress will be slow and measured by how we increase our tax base, but that type of progress can’t be measured in two year election cycles.

**********

AND … On the salaries of City of Worcester employees

The per capita income in Worcester is $24,544; $25,303 District 1, $22,946 District 2, $29,786 District 3, $13,690 District 4, $27,730 District 5. Median income for the City of Worcester is $45,846. The City of Worcester provides the employee wage information via PDF that is not sorted by income and is comprised of over 6757 entries. It would appear that close to 400 city employees make in excess of $100,000. More than half the city employees make more than the per capita income of the residents. How is this equitable or sustainable?

- Michael Gaffney

 

City Councilor at Large candidate Peter C. Kush …

Sunday, April 14th, 2013

By Rosalie Tirella

… one of Worcester’s loathesome ‘anonymous’ cyber bullies has dumped on everybody – even Jesus. Writing a few years back, under his name and not Internet moniker THE COUNT, Kush wrote to his readers, HAPPY ZOMBIE JESUS DAY. It was early April. We can assume Kush was wishing his cohorts a Happy Easter.

What does Worcester get if it chooses to make this nincompoop a city councilor? It gets a cyber bully. A coward. An immature and stupid kid, too connected to have to work hard and chart his own course. A kid who knows that because he is the son of a long-time reporter at the T and G that he will get the powder puff treatment as he makes his belly flop into politics. A guy who has lied about Worcester’s public and private folks, a guy who trumpeted his disdain for Worcester only to turn around and decide that he wants to represent her people as an elected official, a stupid kid who got a city job through his parents and then decided to trash the city, Worcester, in an anonymous blog, STUCK IN COW.

Who needs a twit like Kush deciding important issues like city pension reform or slot casino violence? Who needs a guy who for years was known in the Woo blogosphere as The Count, a persona from which spewed all sorts of hateful ideas, loathesome comments about all things Worcester. Kush, as cowardly and sick as local blogger Claude Dorman, who has been hauled into court several times for the libel/lies he upchucks, was never brave enough to use his real name when writing vile, hurtful lies. Like Dorman, who lives on 38 Sever St., and blogs as the ‘anonymous’ whack job Will WW on his Worcester Wonderland blog, Kush was ‘outed’ by local dude Paulie Collyer. Collyer, who can sniff out a creep as expertly as his sweet Beagle Ginny can track a weiner all the way to Coney Island Hot Dogs, was not up for Kush’s venom. Kush’s lies about him and his life sent Paulie on a journey: The quest to unmask THE COUNT, who by the way, left little photos of The Muppet character as a visual tag to go with his toxic tales, all of which were written while he was an employee of the City of Worcester.

It is pathetic when someone stupid manages to land a job with the city because he is somewhat connected – Kush’s mother Kathy Robertson worked as a community liason flak for Holy Cross college and his dad, Bronny Kush writes for the daily – but it is insulting when the connected loser is the author of an anti-Worcester blog, STUCK IN COW. COW being the acronym for City of Worcester.

Kush also took money from local political candidates as a political consultant – a bribe to get in good with Daddy-Reporter Kush? – only to trash his clients on his blog and Claude Dorman’s blog.

Idiots like Kush and Dorman act out, like all bullies, to feel better about themselves. Woo should send them both packing to … Afghanistan.

Agenda for Worcester City Council meeting, Tues., Apr. 9 …

Monday, April 8th, 2013

… Meeting begins at 7 p.m., in City Hall, Main Street. – R. T.

Click here to see agenda!

Worcester City Council agenda for Tuesday, April 2

Friday, March 29th, 2013

Meeting begins at 7 p.m., City Hall. THE SLOTS PARLOR/CASINO PLAN will be discussed! Be there!  - R. Tirella

click here for agenda

Those pesky panhandlers!

Saturday, February 2nd, 2013

By Rosalie Tirella

That’s what the Worcester City Council must have decided when it voted to treat the city’s panhandlers, folks who beg for money on our streets, the way you would treat, say, a stubborn case of cooties! Yikes! These critters are pesky, a pain in the neck and a public health scourge! Let’s just wash them out of our hair the way you would any varmint.

So our city leaders, lead by City Manager Mike O’Brien, our uber-expert when it comes to urban ills and the downtrodden, decided to make being out in our public streets exercising your freedom of speech a crime. Just the way they do in Russia when the peeps there get too full of themselves. Vladimir Putin would be proud!

So, the city has now decided to give out panhandlers little cards, with the new ordinance spelled out and a phone number to call if you need food, shelter, etc. These push cards are to be given out by our city cops, some of whom are not the friendliest or most sensitive people in Wusta.

I was talking with a pal in social services yesterday about Worcester’s panhandler problem. Let’s call my pal “Ann.” Well, Ann has been working with the city’s poor for decades and has a ton of insight. She is familiar with the struggles of so many city families. She has, over the years, seen it all, and she is half heart, half tough street smarts. While always there to help folks she also knows when she is being conned. Yup, some needy folks, especially heroin addicts, cocaine addicts, can be the biggest liars. Their addiction, so intense and powerful, makes them that way. Businesses, families, condos, etc are lost to drug addiction. Alcohol is also powerfully addictive, for some folks, some bodies, some minds.

Ann told me yesterday that by the time an alcoholic or drug addict has found himself or herself on a street corner begging for money, they have pretty much lost everything. You can’t tumble much lower.

When asked how the city’s push card campaign was gonna fly withthey majority of our city panhandlers, Ann gave me a knowing, world weary look.

Giving a person a card with a phone number ain’t gonna cut it. In fact, the city’s strategy is laughable: Drug addiction can take years to beat, with numerous stays at detox centers, numerous relapses, many moments of despair.

In short, Ann agreed with me that the city, like Boston, needs to hire homeless outreach workers, people who can actually counsel these folks, work with them over a period of weeks, months, maybe longer, if people are lucky enough to survive that long. Ann was direct when she said most addicts, hardcore junkies, alcoholics die. Drug addicts die from getting their bodies so sick or at the hands of a pusher. Drug dealers do not suffer dead beats gladly.

Ann went even further than I have, when it comes to dealing with the city’s panhandlers. She advocates sending out the outreach workers with serious resources, like the ability to get a person into a detox bed immediately, like the ability to help pay a person’s rent for a room, apartment. Beyond dropping them off at the Mustard Seed. Beyond driving them to a food pantry.

Ann told me some interesting stories yesterday, call them drug addicts I have known through the years. One story centered on a drug addict who kept getting dough from a good hearted priest, telling the padre that he needed the $50 to buy food for his family. Ann was visiting the priest when the junky was making his call. Ann knew he had a habit. What are you doing here he asked her. She said I could ask you the same question!

To cut to the chase, Ann told the priest not to give the guy money because he would only spend it on history addiction, not groceries. She went back and forth with the junky who tried to bs her but finally pulled up his long shirt sleeves to show Ann his needle tracks. It was a gesture both honest and heartbreaking.

Another drug abuser that Ann worked with: Years of the ups and downs of trying to stay off cocaine, losing his business, wife, home. Finally, he managed to beat back the demon – stayed straight for months!  He called Ann to tell her the great news … and to take her out to dinner.

To celebrate his sobriety. To thank her for staying after him all those years. Working the problem, not dismissing it. Or him.

We agree with City Councilor Joe O’Brien…

Wednesday, January 30th, 2013

By Rosalie Tirella

… The city manager should follow through with the panhandler/homeless outreach program the city was touting a while back.

Last night, the Worcester City Council voted to make panhandling in Worcester illegal (for the most part). Police officers can be called to shoo away pretty much any person asking for money and issue them a $50 fine. The panhandler won’t go to jail; he/she may have to do community service. Good luck with that one, folks!

Instead of sucking up the valuable time of our city cops, cops who can be put to better use WALKING our inner-city neighborhoods, why not just hire one or two homeless out-reach workers? Kids or adults with some background in human services. People who can go to the panhandlers and tell them where they can go for food, shelter, a hot meal, advocacy etc. Hopefully, that person will even be able to give the panhandler “a lift” to the right social service agency/church, etc.

This new panhandler policy makes the city severe, unforgiving AND it doesn’t eradicate the root problems of homelessness/mental illness and poverty that panhandling is a symptom of.

The city council knows this, but it’s much easier to sweep stuff (and people) under the rug.

District 4 Blues

Saturday, August 25th, 2012

By Ron O’Clair

I was picking up the latest copy of InCity Times and happened to be around when ICT Chief Rosalie was delivering the new edition. We exchanged greetings and hugs, and during our brief conversation a topic came up: our mutual friend Barbara Haller, former long time District 4 Worcester City Councilor.

That got me thinking about all the things that Barbara started in motion that are now paying dividends in my neighborhood after many years of abject neglect and indifference to the plight of the decent, hardworking residents of the area who collectively suffered for many years while our neighborhood was besieged by hordes of criminal minded types that constantly despoiled the peace and serenity of the area.
One of those long suffering residents: Mr. Gerard (Jerry) Michaud, of whom I featured in an article printed in InCity Times. He was a long time resident here in the 700 Block of Main Street and a longtime resident of the building I manage here at 707 Main Street. He just passed away this past week, the fourth week of August, 2012.

Jerry, as everyone called him, had the best view out of this building onto what was a constant parade of lawlessness, seven days a week, and all throughout the night as well. He lived directly above the corner of Main & Charlton Street in the largest room in the building known as: “The Charlton”. He had three windows that faced Main Street, and two that faced Charlton Street. He saw, and heard it all, all day, and all night. It was chaos, plain and simple. The poor guy suffered from emphysema and could hardly breathe towards the end, but he stayed the course living here right up until he died this past week.

He died in the hospital, where he had been spending much of his time recently. Jerry was the type of guy who did for other people, and was very active in the A.A. Program of recovery, as am I. We both had over 30 years of continuous sobriety from alcohol, and were very active in helping bring the message of recovery to those still suffering from alcoholism, or drug abuse.

Living here there were many opportunities to reach out a hand to help an active alcoholic achieve sobriety. Before he took ill, Jerry was the caretaker at the Notre Dame Des Canadien’s Church at Salem Square, where you would often see him at the noontime A.A. meeting that was held there for many years. He was a staunch believer in the program of recovery from alcohol and drug abuse that A.A. has come to serve as a dual purpose recovery program.

Old-timers’ in the halls of A.A., which would apply to Jerry and myself, would tell you that the program of Alcoholics Anonymous is about recovery from alcohol, and only alcohol. That is the primary purpose of A.A., to bring the program of recovery to those that still suffer from alcoholism. In reality, it has morphed over the years into a combination of A.A., & N.A., and no one can tell this old timer any different. Anonymity is essential also, and normally one would not profess in press, radio, or television their full name, I am breaking one of the Traditions of A.A., by putting my name out there as a member of A.A. while still alive. It has been long a tradition to acknowledge membership by name after a person dies, but not before. There have been exceptions, mostly those that are glory hunting and want to take credit for the good works of the fellowship as a whole, as if they were directly responsible for the recovery of this or that member.

In the halls of A.A., Gerard was known as: Jerry M., and I as; Ron O.
Jerry helped a lot of people by leading them into the recovery phase of addiction, and many owe him a debt of gratitude. May Jerry rest in peace, he was a good person, and gave unselfishly to help those less fortunate than himself. I will miss Gerard Michaud, there are not that many like him left in this world of ours today where most people are thinking only of themselves.

This brings me back to Barbara Haller.

Far from thinking only of herself, Barbara represented this district, and all of its inhabitants with a fierce determination to not allow the rights of the people to live in a safe community go unheard.

She was the voice of the people of the 4th District, and worked tirelessly to represent their interests in the Council Chambers. It was primarily due to her efforts that the police patrols that were so instrumental in reclaiming this neighborhood came into reality. Since the crackdown that resulted, the neighborhood has improved dramatically. The hordes of the unwashed, foul mouthed, ignorant, and rude multitudes have found new places to sell their illegal drugs, and to prey on the hardworking residents of the city elsewhere.

It was not all Barbara, all the time, many people worked to change the neighborhood alongside the police, myself included, but Barbara was the magnet that pulled all the pieces together towards one goal, the improvement of an intolerable situation. People would have had to have lived through it to understand just how bad it was. I wrote many articles on the subject to highlight the problems and work towards bringing about a solution.

I never sought, nor received any praise for my efforts to reclaim this neighborhood, and did not bring about the transformation by myself either, but we all put our oars in the water to steer the boat in the right direction. The unifying force behind all the transformation was indeed all Barbara. Without her being in the District 4 seat, none of the action would have happened.

Barbara Haller, if you are reading this: Please run for an at-large seat on the City Council the next time around, you have my vote, as you always did, and I bet there are many other people that did not vote the last time around that regret they did not return you to the post that you so effectively used to transform this nightmare into a semblance of a normal neighborhood.

It was through our collective efforts that the transformation happened, and the police have seemed to have a new attitude as regards the long suffering resident’s rights to a peaceful and quiet neighborhood as to the rights of the lawless to continue to disturb the peace. It never would have happened without you at the helm of the ship that all our oars helped navigate through the troubled waters of an uncaring City Council.
No one did more than you Barbara, yet many were involved in their own little ways. Without all the pieces of the puzzle that you helped put together, none of what has transpired would have taken place.

Poor Jerry spent his last days here in relative peace and quiet, and he never would have had that blessing without your efforts Barbara.

Barbara Haller, District 4 needs you, the City of Worcester needs you, please if you decide to leave the peace and tranquility of Vermont, and come back to Worcester, please run again for the council. The peace and tranquility is not of the sort you are getting used to, but after all the troubles, it is a godsend and you should come to see what you helped achieve.

If you enjoyed this article, or if you hated this article, I would love to have your feedback at: ronaldoclair@hotmail.com

City of Worcester: dump Pat’s Towing Co.!

Monday, February 20th, 2012

By Rosalie Tirella

A few years ago we alerted you to the horrific men of Pat’s Towing on Shrewsbury Street. We told you how Pat’s towed my car with my beloved dog Bailey – who was dying of nasal cancer, his sweet, wet nose dripping with the puss/cancer – to their hell-hole holding center. $100 in cash (money off the books, of course) got me my dog and my car back.

A few days later, InCity Times got tons of phone calls and notes/stories about Pat’s and the abuse old and young suffered at the hands of this Worcester “business.” We remember a pal telling us how Pat’s almost gave a 70-year-old guy a heart attack – taunting him after they towed his vehicle. Another person wrote us and told us how they tried to steal her credit card. They were appallingly rude TO EVERYONE.

Now these creeps are in Worcester court – for beating the heck out of people – for almost killing another person!

Why doesn’t the City of Worcester stop doing business with these thugs?

Why doesn’t City Manager Mike O’Brien revoke their contract with the city? Hire another towing company for the area Pat’s “covers” like a bunch of Good Fellas? There are so many start-ups that need a leg up! Why not hire a few, new fledgling towing companies to take the place of Pat’s Towing “Service”? Why have Pat’s Towing continue to abuse the good people of Worcester – with the City of Worcester’s blessing?

Finally: What does this say about our city government and the people who run it and being connected in Worcester? Pat’s being awarded the city contract year after year – even if they are felons – is wrong. Everyone knows it happens because they are “connected.”

No one in town needs to get beaten up by a City of Worcester-sponsored company.

Next Worcester City Council meeting (they are off this school vacation week), the first order of the day should be: REVOKE PAT’S TOWING COMPANY/SERVICE CENTER contract with the City of Worcester.

“Won’t Get Fooled Again”?

Thursday, December 29th, 2011

“Meet the new boss/same as the old boss … ”

- The Who

But seriously (public info)…

The swearing in of our new mayor, city council and school committee

Free!

Come one, come all to the Inaugural Exercises of the City of Worcester!

Mon., Jan. 2, 3 p.m.

North High School – auditorium
140 Harrington Way
Worcester

- R. Tirella

Worcester City Clerk David Rushford (hog at the municipal trough) and my Christmas gifts …

Friday, December 16th, 2011
By Rosalie Tirella
I could write about how I believe Worcester City Councilors Konnie Lukes and Phil Palmeiri are absolutely RIGHT when they say  City Clerk David Rushford needs to get off the city trough and give up all the dough he is making marrying people, as justice of peace in our City Hall - but I won’t. It’s Christmas. 
But I will say this for now since it will come up for a city council vote soon: If Rushford, who makes over $150,000 between his City Clerk job, his Elections Commission job and his private Justice of the Peace business which he is allowed to run out of City Hall  using City Hall space, time etc ,  wants to do the marrying  job on city time using city resources then he should not be allowed to collect the $60 – $100 fee he charges every time he marries a (1) couple. THAT MONEY SHOULD GO TO THE CITY. IT IS A JOB HE IS PERFORMING IN CITY HALL ON CITY TIME.
Doesn’t the guy make enough money? Hasn’t he hogged three jobs all to himself? Does he need to be the justice of peace from hell? I pity his poor clerks this holiday season. They are working for a prima donna – and can’t utter a peeep.
SO: Let’s take Rushford’s windfall – which Rushford won’t disclose to the public (thousands of dollars) - and use his justice of the peace fees to open up a city branch library or run a program for city kids. We hope Worcester follows Boston, whose city coucilors are also pushing for the same reform, when it comes to keeping the “marrying” fees. Let’s hold our city leaders feet to the fire so they do the right thing.
*******************
Here’s my Christmas gift … I read this in the NYTimes recently.  
 InCity Times has been railing against using chimps for medical experiments (most researchers don’t need them to do their research). We wrote story after story about the issue. And now finally – progress.
 Also,  Congress is moving to ban exotic animals in cirucuses.  California is always ahead of the curve – great op/ed in LA Times:
This is exactly what ICTimes has been pushing for …  for YEARS!
Hooray!
So things like this never happen again: Ringling Bros was fined big time for animal abuse/neglect. One violation: Carting away tiger shit in a wheel barrow and then using the same  wheelbarrow to bring the big cats their food.
Pathetic.