Tag Archives: blogger

Re: Worcester Wonderland blogger = Claude Dorman (writing as Will WW) filing false police reports

Claude Dorman, the Worcester Wonderland blogger (Will WW), leaving the Worcester courthouse last month.

Claude (Will WW) filed two (TWO!) reports with the Worcester Police Dept. on Steve, a man he has never met, a man who has never caused Claude any harm, a man for whom Cluade created CRIMES. False, false, false. Here is a portion of Steve’s letter to the attorney general’s office re: Claude Dorman (Will WW) of 38 Sever St., Worcester. I have made some sentences bold.   – R. Tirella:

  1. In the redacted letter of January 9, 2013 shown at M-135 the blogmaster wrote: “I have filed two incident reports with the police.” I believe this is directly related to question of my discharge. I would like copies of any police reports [XXXX] has in their possession regarding this information.

 

  1. In his letter to you, [XXXX] stated: “However, the IT Department did have such documents and provided them once this letter was received and a search was done to ensure all responsive documents were produced.” If I have not been given ALL the IT documents in [XXX]’s possession, I would like [XXXX] to state that in writing. If they have other documents I should be sent copies.

 

  1. Chapter 149 Section 52C contains a loosely written phrase that a personnel file must include “any other documents relating to disciplinary action regarding the employee.”
  2. Unfortunately, the state legislature did not define what “documents’ meant in this context. Nor does the Code of Massachusetts Regulations. I could not find any advisory on the Attorney General’s web site.

The central focus in this matter is my use of the company computer. That was the basis of the decision to discharge me and suspend me. I would therefore like to narrow the focus to those relevant emails can be retrieved at the least expense of time to [XXX]. I would like to request that {XXX] provided the following:

  1. Copies of emails to [XX] and [XX] from the IT department on the investigation.

 

  1. Copies of emails from the IT department to the HR representatives present where I was suspended.

 

  1. Copies of the emails between [XXX] and [XXX] discussing the decision to suspend and terminate me. This are key documents regarding my discharge and ultimately were the records on which the decision was made.

 

I request that [XXX] submit an evidence log, listing all the files above it has, which ones were released, and their grounds for not releasing them

Thank you! I am attaching list of the documents in this letter, in the event you want to send it to [XXX] asking them the documents to me.

Sincerely yours,

**********

DOCUMENTS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IS ORDERED TO BE RELEASED BY [XXXXX]  TO STEVEN R. MAHER.

 

  1. Internally produced [XXX] studies, which evaluate the allegations by Mr. Dorman, be they written or electronic.

 

  1. Identify the HR representative who wrote the handwritten notes on M-151 and M-152 and the date they were written.

 

  1. Any police reports [XXX] has in their possession regarding Steven R. Maher.

 …

Letter to the Attorney General re: the demented Worcester Wonderland blogger Claude Dorman (aka Will W. W.)

editor’s note: How sick is Claude Dorman, the author of the Worcester Wonderland blog? Pretty sick. Dorman, who lives at 38 Sever St., Worcester, with his wife Kunigunde, didn’t like Steve visiting his website. So he went to the police and filed two police reports on Steve. Then he sent spread sheets, paper work galore re: Steve, trumped up charges, to Steve’s employer. Lies, lies, lies. Readers of Worcester Wonderland blog, where Dorman writes as the “anonymous” blogger Will W. W.,  PLEASE beware! You could be Dorman’s next victim! He wants to ruin people’s lives.

Here is a portion of the letter Steve sent to the attroney general’s office, re: Claude Dorman/Will W. W.. I have deleted his employer’s name and its attorney’s name, also the attorney general contact person’s name.  I have made some sentences bold. – R. Tirella 

***********************

Dear XXXX:

I received last night the response from XXXX Counsel XXXX. I am not wholly satisfied with the response. I received the following:

A letter dated January 9, 20013 from the “blogmaster” of the Worcester Wonderland website. (See M-135 attached.) I understand the blogmaster is Claude Dorman. I will presume it was his name that was redacted, and will reference him below.

Two sheets containing threats against Claude Dorman. These sheets do not contain any information linking me (such as an IP address) to these threats. (See attached M-136 and M-137.) XXX stated XXXX could not substantiate these threats.

What looks like a one page summary of five days in December 2013 (See M-138). Why this appears in a different format from the rest of the documents provided was not explained. I will state below why I believed this is a falsified document.

A thirteen page report on my access to the Worcester Wonderland website for December 2012. This does not look like a report generated from a reporting package. It looks like a spreadsheet printout. I believe it is possible Mr. Dorman downloaded this information and then falsified the spreadsheet by copying entries to other lines. (See M-139 through M-150).

Two pages of handwritten notes from an unidentified XXXX  person. (See M-151-M-152).

These documents raise a number of questions:

The complaint by Mr. Dorman dated January 9, 2013 references the report attached at M-139 through M-150. Yet if you look at M-148 through M-150 you see almost three pages of data dated after January 9, 2013. This is evidence that Mr. Dorman in fact fabricated this report, unless he has a time travel machine allowing him to go weeks ahead into the future to bring back to the past documents for his January 9, 2013 complaint.

This reports shows that much of the time I spent on this website were before the workday began, during my lunch period, or after work. This was not in violation of XXXX policy. To a large degree, this is exculpatory evidence for me, not XXXX. Additionally, most of the Internet visits were doing non-peak days of the month …

Mr. Dorman claims receiving threats from me on December 27, 2012 and December 31, 2012. (See M-136d M-137 Yet if you look at the report on pages M-139 through M-150 I was not logged on to the website at the time the alleged threats were made. The only record of my being on the system is the one page summary on Page M-138. This is the page that I have asserted Mr. Dorman fabricated.

Mr. Dorman said on M-138 that I that I had visited his website 539 occasions for a total of 248 hours, 48 minutes, and some 4 seconds. The XXX  HR person wrote the following: “In the last six months Steve has been on the website 560+ hours.” This is a lie  …

The evil “anonymous” blogger Claude Dorman who writes as Will W. W. on his toxic blog, Worcester Wonderland,  and his wife Kunigunde.

How Worcester Wonderland blogger Claude Dorman cooks the numbers …

Claude Dorman, the Worcester Wonderland blogger (Will WW)

Old Will WW (Claude Dorman of 38 Sever St.) has been inflating his numbers, deflating everyone else’s. Here are portions of Steve’s letter to authorities, re: how Claude manipulated the number of visits Steve made to Claude’s website, Worcester Wonderland. I have deleted the name of Steve’s former employer and made some sentences of Steve’s letter bold. Here is the letter …. – R. Tirella
***************
Dear …

… However, the analysis I have done of the documents provided Monday is devastating to [XXXXX] assertion I was fired because of excess use of the Internet. I am bringing it to your attention so that you know it is with good reason that I ask the Attorney General to order the release of further documents.

The information on the analysis done by [XXXX] on my computer usage (the “XXXX Documents”), shown at Exhibits M-138 through M-150 (faxed you on Tuesday), is misrepresented. I spent only 27 minutes on company time over a two-month period looking at the websites in question.

… In the attached spreadsheet is a detailed analysis of the XXXX Data. Recently XXXX has been advertising my job on the Internet at a greatly reduced pay scale, which I suspect is the real I was discharged.

What Dorman did on the analysis he sent XXXX was to double count my visits to his website. What XXXX did was ignore, or not even investigate, the data provided by Dorman. The data showed I was on the Internet during my lunch break or before work.

We had flexible work hours. We could start at 8:00 AM or 8:30 AM. Most days I would come in prior to 8:30 AM, turn on the computer, check my personal email, and sometimes Dorman’s website, which I monitored to see if Dorman smeared me on his website, as he had done with so many others.

Lunch breaks were also flexible at XXXX. The cafeteria was jammed after noontime, so I would break for lunch between 10:45 AM and 12:00 AM to use the microwave. I believe there was only one microwave available in December.

The spreadsheet analysis was done as follows:

1. In the first tab, entitled “Baseline”, I loaded in the data from exhibits M-138 through M-150. XXXX’s lawyer said they analyzed my visits to two websites: Worcester Magazine and Worcester Wonderland. However, because Dorman bragged about the spyware his website attached to his visitors’ computers, I normally entered his web site via Worcester Magazine, where there is a link to Worcester Wonderland. It’s obvious from the formats and titles that the analysis was done by Mr. Dorman, who mentions in his January 9, 2013 letter that he included a computer analysis with his letter (See M-135).

2. In the second tab entitled “Duplicates”. I highlighted the “News /Media” data in yellow and the Worcester Wonderland data (Dorman’s site) in green. I sorted all the Data by date and time. There were sixty or so identical entries. These showed that eight or nine times in one minute I accessed both sites, which is absurd. I then highlighted in blue the entries that were identical.

3. In the third tab entitled “WW Not Duplicates Sorted by Size” the remaining forty-five green (Worcester Wonderland) entries. Theoretically, these could be entries where I entered the Worcester Wonderland directly. However, as I will show below, it is highly likely that many of these were fraudulent. The data was then sorted by the “Bytes Out” column. As I suspected, much of this data had similar size quantities and measurements. In the tab this data is highlighted in yellow. Sixty percent of this data was of blocks of identical size, with the Bytes Out, Bytes In, and measurements being exactly the same. This strongly suggest, give the statistical size of the universe being analyzed, that the data was either redundant or fraudulently manipulated. Half the forty-five items in this tab were timed during my lunch break or pre-work period.

These facts strongly suggest two conclusions: the analysis submitted was distorted by the fact that I entered the Wonderland website through Worcester Magazine; or Dorman fabricated this study to exaggerate my computer usage. Dorman has been known – which I can prove in court – to fabricate charts and statistics about numerous people and place them on his website. …

I concluded by putting the Worcester Magazine data into the next tab, and extracting out the data where I accessed the website on my own time. This showed that I used the XXXX computer for a grand total of twenty-seven minutes during the two months in question. My analysis here may not be perfect, I may have spent another ten or fifteen minutes on the Worcester Wonderland site than this shows. But it is a lot closer to reality than what XXXX claims about me.

Sincerely yours,

Steven R. Maher

Bummer!

By Rosalie Tirella

It seems I cannot share with you the photo of city councilor at large candidate Peter Kush in his big white rabbit suit. I went through my media library, and while I have a photo of The Count with dad Bronny Kush, the one I wrote about in my last post and have run here, the Peter Kush rabbit pic is gone!!! Oh, no!

What a shame! I think candidate Peter Kush is actually an adult in this picture. He is on stage, looking goofy in his rabbit duds. But not as goofy as he made client Virginia Ryan look. Not as goofy as he made himself look as author of his own anonymous blog, Cow Patch (as in pile of shit) and his dissing Wusta stuff under the pen name The Count.

Peter Kush is just one big, over-grown, spoiled, emotionally stunted child who got his last job through his parents. This little nincompoop is the last thing we need on the Worcester City Council.To behave like a child and then next year turn around and try to run for office, is a joke.

Put this Peter Rabbit back in the hat!

Pater with Peter!  …. Dad Bronny Kush is on left, city councilor wannabe Peter C. Kush is on right.

Worcester Wonderland blogger Claude Dorman, 38 Sever St., Worcester, in court again!

Yup, guys and gals, ol’ Claude Dorman, the Wonderland blogger (aka Will – tall guy in this photo) was in Worcester court again, re: his blog! Case continued to September! We will report all the news here! He really is an abusive fellow! He just can’t believe we outed him and changed his life (he’s moving/selling his home; doesn’t write nearly as viciously about folks in town before we outed him; has skipped the poison re certain festivals, people, places; won’t write anything about his likes/dislikes/personal life – like he used to. No vacation pics!!!)

So I guess Claudo is upset with us …

Too bad, Claudo!

– R. Tirella

10 Things you can do with the Worcester Wonderland blogger’s (Claude Dorman’s) picture:

Worcester Wonderland blogger Will WW is really this dork, pictured above: Claude Dorman, 57 years old. (The photo was taken in 2005 – folks say Claude/Will WW has aged badly/stupidly)

Years of Will WW’s/Claude’s creepy/toxic/underhanded/police-calling/court-hassle-ing ways have resulted in this photo!

Top Uses for Claude/Worcester Wonderland blogger photo:

1. The obvious: Print out this Wonderland/Claude poster and use it as toilet paper

2. Print out this poster and Gorilla Glue it to: lamp posts, telephone poles, bathroom stall doors etc.

3. Print out and tape  inside your car’s windows, home windows … any window really!

4. Print out this poster – make very large – and send it to: CLAUDE DORMAN, 38 Sever St., Worcester, MA 01609. Address it to: Worcester Wonderland blogger/Will WW/Claude Dorman!

5. Print out and make flyers and hand out to passersby!  But first, on the other side of your Wonderland/Claude leaflet, print the ENTIRE WoMag piece on Claude and his evil website and police-calling (74 times in one day on nearby Becker College students!) ways.

6. Print out and make into Tee-Shirts and sell them in the Elm Park neighborhood. Everyone there hates their neighbor Claude/Will WW. They want to see him move out and (thankfully) he has put his house up for sale. 

7. Don’t print this pic out but BUY CLAUDE’s house at 38 Sever St. Here’s the listing: http://www.massrealty.com/worcester/worcester/home/38-Sever-St,-Worcester,-MA-01609/71364362   Do Worcester a huge favor!

Good luck!

Claude Dorman, Worcester Wonderland blogger aka “The Wizard of Claude”!

By Rosalie Tirella

Yesterday, after reading Claude’s Dorman’s blog, Worcester Wonderland, I thought: Court again!

But NOPE. There was no court date – just Dorman rehashing the court date of a few weeks ago. Claude, I guess, expected to see me and Paulie dragged off in chains that day. He didn’t. The judge dismissed the case.

So I have deleted yesterday’s blog post (unlike Claude who would a. keep it up and b. concoct even more lies – the guy is totally nutso!) to write a new post:

So now Claude Dorman has become the “Stormin’ Dorman” that the Worcester Police Department has laughed about. He is in meltdown mode and is playing out the court case he lost via his toxic blog, reframing the court events, lying about the proceedings and the people there so he can:

1. feel better about losing

2. whip up some sympathy for himself – a guy who has trashed the entire city, pissed half the city off … defamed EVERYONE he was a wee bit jealous of. People tell me has serious mental health issues.

Let’s just call him … “The Wizard of Claude”!

Last night I was texting Bill and I texted at one point: Claude thought he was Superman but we (Paulie, Harry, Bill and me) we were his Kryptonite!

A few minutes passed. Then my phone buzzes. It’s Bill with: “More like the Wizard of Claude. You were Dorothy and we were the straw man, the lion and the tin man.”

Ha!

Then another buzz from Bill: “Paul is the lion. Harry the tin man. I am the scare crow.”

Hilarious!

And so true. Here we were, the entire city really, wondering who was the almighty Wonderland? Could his magical web powers hurt us? Help us? Send us hurtling back to … Somerville or Green Island?

We – the lion, the tin man and Dorothy – went on our “little adventure” – did the work, the rersearch, suffered for our knowledge/enlightenment, had silly conversations ’round midnight …. THEN FINALLY! … We find The Wizard of Claude!

We have the magic name! Oh, my!

But who is this all powerful entity? Just old Claude Dorman, a crank who lives at 38 Sever St., right here in Worcester – a screwed-up 50-something who has salt and pepper hair and has a history of harassing and calling the police and hauling into court lots of Worcesterites.

The Wizard of Claude – just some middle-aged jamoke messing with his coumputer, some cheapo light machine – behind the big curtain of his security-camera covered home by Elm Park.

Where are my ruby slippers?

Worcester Wonderland blogger, Claude Dorman, plays the victim …

… but the truth is Dorman (writing as Will WW on his Worcester Wonderland blog) has been harassing Worcester folks for years – pulling horrible, illegal cyber stunts. He’s been outed and now he’s raging. (Stormin’ Dorman is what the WPD call him) And YES Jeremy wanted a comment from Claude re: his WoMag story – Claude gave no comment. Said nothing.

Here, from the WoMag article, is what Claude Dorman, the Worcester Wonderland blogger, has been up to these past several years. –

But before, we get to the article, here is what Claude Dorman, under the pen name Will WW, the Worcester Wonderland blogger, wrote to his website visitors (he has since deleted it from his blog – but we have the original pages). – R. Tirella
**************************

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

Got a Sneaky Feeking?

By Worcester Wonderland blogger Claude Dorman, 38 Sever St. Worcester, MA aka Will WW

There’s plenty of interesting information about the anonymity issue on the Electronic Frontier Foundation site.

Seems some of you are quite surprised to find out that you’re being tracked when you visit Worcester Wonderland. Why? You all do it. Some even parade their stats like medals.

Otta tell ya I’ve got some pretty snazzy software and scripts that yield tons of technical info on visitors – goes beyond simple logging scripts, even read serial numbers. Something pretty hard to mask. I even put Hot Flash Cookies on your drive. Really pesky critters. Can’t get rid of em easily. Some stuff goes deeper. But that’s top secret. Scary eh? Not really. Imagine what the US Gov uses? Now that’s really scary.

… And please don’t go doing any meltdowns here, all your comments are stored, even if you think you deleted them yourself. They just might come back to haunt you. Wouldn’t be pretty for your precious reputations. I got some good ones from former blogging buddy aka Harry Tembenis, who did the meltdown of all meltdowns. Got all that recorded. Interesting reading.

And then there’s Brendan Melican’s meltdown – a psychopath masquerading as a sociopath. Talk about vile. Whew! All his comments were recorded. Heck of a collection. Maybe I oughta post the really vile ones.

Welcome to Wusta!
***************************************
From the Womag piece on Worcester Wonderland blogger, Claude Dorman, (aka Will WW):

Claude Dorman, the Wonderland blooger who writes under Will WW:

… “By 2008 it had turned personal, the writer focusing on other bloggers, politicians and those both in the public and not-so-public realm. The blogger’s bio summed up the tone of many of his postings: “This is a blog about being amused and bemused with a city of 181,042 boring people with an exaggerated sense of self-worth. It’s really too bad they don’t have a sense of humor, it would make life bearable here.”

“I’ve just never encountered anybody who has that much interest in me,” says Paul Collyer, who found his personal life and business ventures – particularly his NOLA Festival – often the target of Will W.W.’s blog posts.

“It wasn’t just the content that riled up his targets (to the point where some, including Collyer, put out a “bounty” to unmask Will W.W.’s identity in 2011), but the anonymity of it.

” “Not content with writing about others on his own page, Will W.W. began posting insulting comments on other blogs.

“ … Tembenis, for instance, still smolders over an insulting Worcester Wonderland post that used images from an article about a Rutland horseback riding trail named in honor of his son, Elias, who died at seven years old. The post generated 22 comments, mostly derogatory towards Tembenis, and including this from Will W.W.: “Thankfully Mother Nature had the wisdom to prevent his kind from propagating.”

“That in essence shows how deranged this individual is. He posts outright lies about people and also slanders and libels, too, all in the name of being able to do so ‘anonymously,’” Tembenis adds.

“Throughout the four and a half years of this, Will W.W. took the protection of his identity a step further than a fake name: he also scrambled his computer’s IP address – the line of numbers that can identify a computer’s location and Internet provider – making it difficult for even the most tech-savvy sleuths to figure out who or where he was.

” … Dorman, who changed his phone number after his ties to Worcester Wonderland came out, had no comment.

“Dorman has a history of targeting others anonymously, even appearing in a Worcester Magazine article in 2007 for ousting a rival member of a neighborhood association, Robert Bourassa, by using pseudonymous online threats and postings to attack his business and personal reputation (“Neighbor to Neighbor Disfavor: A grudge sparks a change of leadership in the Elm Park Association,” May 17, 2007).

” “The malicious, unwarranted and slanderous attacks on my business and personal reputation by Claude Dorman under the guise of various identities and the lies he has spread have devastated my contracting business, forcing me to close and putting me in a severe financial hardship,” Bourassa wrote in a letter to members of the Lincoln Estates – Elm Park Neighborhood Association before his final meeting. “As such, I can no longer afford to remain where I live.”

“Before stepping down, however, Bourassa filed a lawsuit against Dorman and his wife, Kunigunde Cigan, in February 2008, citing criminal harassment, stalking, attempted extortion, false use of names or organizations and violations of right to peace and privacy, among others.

” “Defendants have engaged in a now twenty month long campaign of harassment of Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s businesses,” read the complaint. “There is no question the course of action, no doubt the intent, no question the harm.”

“Elsewhere in the complaint, Bourassa provided claims that Dorman used various IP addresses to flag Bourassa’s web design and contractor business advertisements on Craigslist – 673 times for 164 ads – causing them all to be removed. He also charged Dorman for creating the elmparkneighbors.net website (to closely mimic the neighborhood association’s elmparkneighbors.org), where he posted Bourassa’s financial and personal information – some of it obtained, Bourassa charged, by intercepting his mail. Dorman used fake names to send harassing and threatening emails to Bourassa through the websites he managed and posted poor reviews of his businesses on websites and online forums.

” ” … Collyer says he and other targets of Will W.W. are entertaining the idea of a lawsuit, especially since there’s worn ground after Bourassa’s complaint.

“They’ve gone out of their way to hurt my festival,” says Collyer.

” “Dorman has really gone out of his way to financially hurt people,” Collyer says …

” … Collyer says he hasn’t crossed the same line that Dorman has.

“That thing [the alter ego Claude-Dorman website, which has since been taken down] has been up for four or five days,” he says, comparing that to four and half years of Worcester Wonderland.

” “It shows we are dealing with evil cats and one who has a history of this type of harassment going back years,” he adds. “This is no longer about opinion and discussion, it is about harassment against many.”

Claude Dorman = Wonderland blogger = law breaker

From a discerning reader/legal beagle, re: old Claude Dorman.  – R. Tirella 

http://worcesterwonderland.blogspot.com/2010/07-electronic-frontier-foundation-sneaking.html   …he [Wonderland Will WW/Claude Dorman] basically ADMITS he plants stuff on people’s pc’s who go to his website so he can spy on them !!!!!

This is in CLEAR violation of Google/Blogger.com’s content policy !!!!! See for yourself…

Malware and viruses: Do not create blogs that transmit viruses, cause pop-ups, attempt to install software without the reader’s consent, or otherwise impact readers with malicious code. This is strictly forbidden on Blogger.”

http://www.blogger.com/content.g

************************************************

FYI, Claude Dorman, the Wonderland blogger (Will WW)! From: Blogger.com/content.

This is where Claude, the guy who owns and writes the Wonderland blog, has his website and posts his garbage.  It is run by Google.  Here are Google’s rules, re: blogs on their Blogger.com sites: – R. T.

“Blogger is a free service for communication, self-expression and freedom of speech. We believe Blogger increases the availability of information, encourages healthy debate, and makes possible new connections between people.

“We respect our users’ ownership of and responsibility for the content they choose to share. It is our belief that censoring this content is contrary to a service that bases itself on freedom of expression.

“In order to uphold these values, we need to curb abuses that threaten our ability to provide this service and the freedom of expression it encourages. As a result, there are some boundaries on the type of content that can be hosted with Blogger. The boundaries we’ve defined are those that both comply with legal requirements and that serve to enhance the service as a whole.

“Content Boundaries

“Our content policies play an important role in maintaining a positive experience for you, the users. Please respect these guidelines. From time to time, we may change our content policies so please check back here. Also, please note that when applying the policies below, we may make exceptions based on artistic, educational, documentary, or scientific considerations or where there are other substantial benefits to the public from not taking action on the content.

“Adult Content: We do allow adult content on Blogger, including images or videos that contain nudity or sexual activity. But, please mark your blog as ‘adult’ in your Blogger settings. Otherwise, we may put it behind a ‘mature content’ interstitial.

“There are some exceptions to our adult content policy:

  • “Do not use Blogger as a way to make money on adult content. For example, don’t create blogs where a significant percentage of the content is ads or links to commercial porn sites.
  • “No incest or bestiality content: We do not allow image, video or text content that depicts or encourages incest or bestiality.

“Child safety: We have a zero tolerance policy towards content that exploits children. Some examples of this include:

  • “Child pornography: We will terminate the accounts of any user we find publishing or distributing child pornography. We will also report that user to law enforcement.
  • “Pedophilia: We do not allow content that encourages or promotes sexual attraction towards children. For example, do not create blogs with galleries of images of children where the collection of images or text accompanying the images is sexually suggestive.

“Hate Speech: We want you to use Blogger to express your opinions, even very controversial ones. But, don’t cross the line by publishing hate speech. By this, we mean content that promotes hate or violence towards groups based on race, ethnicity, religion, disability, gender, age, veteran status, or sexual orientation/gender identity. For example, don’t write a blog saying that members of Race X are criminals or advocating violence against followers of Religion Y.

“Crude Content: Don’t post content just to be shocking or graphic. For example, collections of close-up images of gunshot wounds or accident scenes without additional context or commentary would violate this policy.

“Violence: Don’t threaten other people on your blog. For example, don’t post death threats against another person or group of people and don’t post content encouraging your readers to take violent action against another person or group of people.

“Copyright: It is our policy to respond to clear notices of alleged copyright infringement. More information about our copyright procedures can be found here. Also, please don’t provide links to sites where your readers can obtain unauthorized downloads of other people’s content.

“Personal and confidential information: It’s not ok to publish another person’s personal and confidential information. For example, don’t post someone else’s credit card numbers, Social Security numbers, unlisted phone numbers, and driver’s license numbers. Also, please keep in mind that in most cases, information that is already available elsewhere on the Internet or in public records is not considered to be private or confidential under our policies.

“Impersonating others: Please don’t mislead or confuse readers by pretending to be someone else or pretending to represent an organization when you don’t. We’re not saying you can’t publish parody or satire – just avoid content that is likely to mislead readers about your true identity.

“Illegal activities: Don’t use Blogger to engage in illegal activities or to promote dangerous and illegal activities. For example, don’t author a blog encouraging people to drink and drive. Otherwise, we may delete your content. Also, in serious cases such as those involving the abuse of children, we may report you to the appropriate authorities.

“Spam: Spam takes several forms in Blogger, all of which can result in deletion of your account or blog. Some examples include creating blogs designed to drive traffic to your site or to move it up in search listings, posting comments on other people’s blogs just to promote your site or product, and scraping existing content from other sources for the primary purpose of generating revenue or other personal gains.

“Malware and viruses: Do not create blogs that transmit viruses, cause pop-ups, attempt to install software without the reader’s consent, or otherwise impact readers with malicious code. This is strictly forbidden on Blogger.

“Enforcement of Blogger’s Content Policy

“If you encounter a blog that you believe violates our content policies, please report it to us using the ‘Flag Blog’ link located at the top of each blog (Note: If the blog owner has hidden this link, you can still report the blog by filling out this form).

“Our team reviews these flags for policy violations. If the blog does not violate our policies, we will not take any action against the blog or blog owner. If we find that a blog does violate our content policies, we take one or more of the following actions based on the severity of the violation:

  • “Put the blog behind a ‘mature content’ interstitial
  • “Put the blog behind an interstitial where only the blog author can access the content
  • “Delete the blog
  • “Disable the author’s access to his/her Blogger account
  • “Disable the author’s access to his/her Google account
  • “Report the user to law enforcement”

Wonderland blogger …

… lies. A few days ago he posted that we had created a fake letter from a fake intern wannabe. Liar! We did get a letter from a Devin Mott. He wanted to do research for us. We printed the letter below, then I published some of his poems in my newspaper, InCity Times, along with Devin’s photo.

Why does Will WW. enjoy hurting children?

I can’t wait for tomorrow’s anonymous cyber bully article to come out, Will WW. You’re the master of rancid.

– R.Tirella