Tag Archives: downtown development

Revitalizing downtown Worcester

By Philip Stone

Many thanks to Barbara Haller for speaking out and supporting the CDC’s in Worcester [ICT, V. 13, #5]. As to Dots 1 and 2 [in her op-ed piece], there is no question that the downtown area [of Worcester] is the “hole in the doughnut” and in need of attention. I believe however that the “The Downtown Worcester Theater District Master Plan” is seriously flawed.

Earlier this year the Worcester Business Development Corp. hung a large banner on the wall of the YWCA proclaiming that: “The Answer is Downtown”. The Question is unstated, but I believe we are being asked: “What is the Purpose of Worcester’s Downtown?”

For more than 25 years I have parked in the Federal Plaza Garage and walked down Main Street to my law offices, located at different times on Pleasant Street, Mechanic Street and for the past ten years, Front Street, but all within a block of City Hall. Each of those buildings is now an empty shell of what they once were.

During this time I have witnessed the gradual exodus of professionals from downtown: the doctors, the dentists, and the accountants. Lawyers remain because the Federal and state courthouses are on Main Street.

As demand for office space has declined, so too have the rents landlords can ask. Rental income is often insufficient to properly maintain the office buildings, assuming their owners have a genuine desire to do so. A spiral of neglect encourages existing tenants to leave, and discourages prospective tenants.

The new bus hub near Union Station has deprived the small businesses clustered around City Hall of many of their customers, and seriously inconvenienced users of what little remains of public transportation in the second largest city in New England. The Bus Hub is another example of top-down, well-intentioned planning that failed to include the stakeholders in any discussions of the WRTA’s plans until it was too late, and the decisions had already been made.

The retail businesses that do remain cater to the people who presently live downtown, who in turn are attracted by relatively low rents.

The underlying hope of the Theater District Master Plan is to attract other people to live downtown and support local restaurants and retail businesses, transforming what was once a retail and central business district into a mixed use environment anchored by higher education, and populated by students and employees with money in their pockets.

Attracting educated professionals employed by UMMC and the city’s colleges and universities is an ambitious goal. As long as the school systems of the surrounding towns are rightfully perceived as being superior to Worcester’s, professionals with children will probably choose to live elsewhere.

Some small business owners have proceeded on faith. The former Red Baron is now Jak’s Pub offering craft beers, and the Theater Cafe has tied its hopes to the Hanover. But the Hanover Theater is dark more often than not. Small restaurants and cafes will not survive in such an environment, and they lack the means to serve large numbers of people wanting to eat at the same time. One theater is not a district. In fact, there are seven existing theater and performance venues downtown. Plans for a large restaurant next to the Hanover have been put on hold – the numbers simply do not work.

Over the years many restaurants have come and gone downtown. Friendly’s, McDonalds and Burger King all closed their Main Street operations. The eateries that do remain cater to downtown office workers, and close in mid-afternoon – and they are not near the Hanover Theater.

Successful downtown areas are characterized by pedestrian friendly design. WBDC’s proposal to build a new parking garage on Portland and Myrtle Streets needs more scrutiny. A four to six story garage would dominate the existing area, and alter the scale of the neighborhood.

Perceptions of personal safety in large garages are critical to their success. The garage behind the former Galleria was notorious for the fear it created among women patrons. Federal Plaza Garage works because there are clear lines of sight from the elevators over the entire parking floor. Exiting the Federal Plaza Garage is a challenge that could be solved by converting Chatham Street to two-way traffic between High Street and Main Streets.

Merchants correctly claim that there is a need for additional short-term parking downtown. Small-scale attractively landscaped lots are more desirable than the large multi-story structures that have been recently built, and they encourage people to run in and out for quick errands.

Rather than being gerrymandered into a “Downtown Worcester Theater District Master Plan”, commercial “problem properties” should be targeted for Fire and Code Enforcement, and purchased if necessary. While aesthetics are difficult to regulate, billboards do not belong in the downtown area.

Working in Downtown Worcester is like living in a chronic state of emergency. The incessant stream of siren-wailing ambulances needs to be re-routed off Main Street, perhaps up Myrtle Street and then onto Francis McGrath – Worcester Center – Major Taylor Boulevard, all of which have minimal pedestrian activity, to the hospitals.

Perceptions of public safety are shaped by seeing other people on the street, not more uniformed police. The Common should be policed by officers on bicycles or Segways – not on motorcycles which are both a safety hazard and ineffective; police cruisers should not be driven and parked on the sidewalks around City Hall. The more people on the street at night, the safer an area is perceived to be. Similarly, the presence of women and children increases the perception of safety.

At the end of the day, small improvements of modest cost will do more to improve the downtown experience. For example, around the Hanover Theater there is no sidewalk on Main Street in the Federal Square park area, which forces pedestrians to walk in the street. The surface of the park area used by theater goers who park in Federal Plaza Garage is uneven and needs to be replaced. The fountain, which was improperly winterized, is now the most expensive planter on Main Street and ought to be repaired.

Staffed, clean and safe public rest rooms, rather than unheated Porta-Pottys, would attract more users to the skating rink and other events on the Common. A Tot Lot on the Common, and family-friendly activities and amenities would do much to improve the attractiveness of downtown Worcester.

Philip M. Stone is an attorney with offices in Downtown Worcester. He has served as an active member of the Board of Worcester Common Ground, Inc. since 1994.

Went to a party in Main South last night …

… on the road home I couldn’t help but notice the city looking so … regal. I mean it! Tree-lined inner-city streets, a downtown with kids walking around (notice there are more young people making their way around city hall and the public library during week days?  Super!) The garbage and abandoned cars seemingly gone. All the colorful flowers and flower pots – bursting all over our city! Restaurants galore. Yeah, I had a good buzz on, but it couldn’t all be attributed to the white Russians! … Kelley Square, Green Island, Main South, Downtown – pretty but still gritty enough for me … made me feel like this song …

Click here to watch video!

… (You can never go wrong with T REX!) – R. T.


A song and … my car broke down …

… and the Old Injun Fighter came through for me and drove me around today (what a good egg!)  This morning, still missing his gnarly presence in my life, I asked him what he thought about my anti-slots-parlor crusade. The OIF is a realist, in the most brutal terms. Looking straight at me, he said: Yes. The people of Worcester will vote yes for this mess.

He told me people like this stuff. He couldn’t care one way or the other, but yes, Worcesterites will vote YES for the Green Island slots parlor and other gambling goodies/bribes slated for downtown.

This depressed me and I yelled at him: BUT YOU’LL VOTE NO DURING THE REFERENDUM, RIGHT?! YOU’LL VOTE NO!! VOTE NO!!!

Usually, he will vote the way I ask him to/ in a liberal/libertarian/progressive way, especially when it comes to the environment (which he is passionate about). But he was not up for the politics this morning (I always am). So I let up. But I did get his vote against the slots parlor!

Well, now that the “oracle,” has spoken, I am … blue. About slots. About losing him. We went to scores of concerts together. Saw The Moody Blues two or three times. I love this group, despite their kooky forays into poetry. Thought of this Justin Hayward song after the Old Injun Fighter dropped me off.

– R. Tirella

click on link below pics to hear a very romantic MB tune, written and performed by the lovely Justin Hayward!

Click here for song!




Stop sigh-ns

By Rosalie Tirella

Drove through the Front Street/East Side intersection I wrote about a few days ago. Seems one of the disappearing stop signs at downtown Worcester’s newest hub has magically reappeared, this time as a tall brand new stop sign plunked into a new tar sidewalk. Looks Ok, does the job. Drivers were stopping at the new stop sign … .

Good job, Wusta!

But then there is the other stop sign, the opposite one in the middle of the road. It looks just like the ugly pathetic little stop sign stuck in the middle of Harding Street, in the new and sexy Canal District. You know the stop sign: the one dropped in the middle of Harding Street, at the intersection of Harding and Harrison streets. The filthy, rusted, crooked stop sign that DOES A SHITTY JOB OF CONTROLING TRAFFIC AT A VERY BUSY INTERSECTION. (blinking red light, anyone?)

But I digress. What I wanted to say was that the downtown stop sign is just as much of an eye sore as the Harding Street one: about three feet high, stuck in a dirty concrete base, misshapen/bent. The City of Worcester’s latest contribution to urban renewal: The Munchkin Stop Sign.

Can’t the City of Worcester’s traffic engineer/DPW’s Bob Moylan do better than these two ugly munchkin stop signs? I mean this is what visitors see when they come to our city. And the little one downtown gets no respect. Drivers go to the left and right of it, if they are in a hurry and the car before them is deemed too pokey.

Another place in the city that could use a REAL STOP SIGN, NOT THE TOY STOP SIGNS OF THE CANAL DISTRICT AND DOWNTOWN. This dangerous intersection is in my old hood, the intersection of Bigelow and Sigel streets. Green Island, near Crompton Park, which I drive by daily.

Some little kid is gonna lose his or her life at this intersection. For years, you always had the stop sign on Bigelow, so you stopped to make sure traffic was not zipping down Sigel. But last summer I almost got totalled as a huge truck barreled down Sigel, VERY FAST, ripping off my front bumper. Traumatic. My little car. The truck driver’s huge truck. Later, a pal from the hood told me there are lots of commercial trucks zooming down Sigel Street as they hurry to get to Millbury Street or Quinsigamond Ave. There are lots of little Latino kids who live near the intersection and cross it often – with the commercial trucks barreling down their street, a street which is lined with cute three deckers filled with families.

The city needs to make that intersection a four way stop. Put a stop sign at Sigel Street. Our city is getting bigger, busier. That’s a good thing! But traffic patterns are changing. Our traffic engineer needs to put his thinking cap on and make the necessary improvements/adjustments.

Reimagining Worcester, Part 2: Academic Retention

By Jim May

First, just a few comments from the feedback I’ve received. Respecting the Blackstone River in Part 1 was also about the need to reconnect with it mentally to better understand how the City was shaped by it over the centuries. Worcester isn’t going to build some kind of inland waterway garden zone if the water’s not clean first. There can be no Canal Project without a water project of some magnitude. And when you’re thinking about Boston pipeline disaster that happened this week, it should be well noted by Worcesterites that we own our water supplies. There’s value to clean water. We take it for granted, and we shouldn’t.

Second, the Worcester sewer plant (aka Upper Blackstone Abatement Plant) is in violation of the Clean Water Act. The City is in danger of a losing big in a lawsuit for polluting the Blackstone River, Narragansett Bay and several towns and cities along the way. Continue reading Reimagining Worcester, Part 2: Academic Retention