Tag Archives: human rights

Congressman McGovern Condemns Trump’s Move to Sell Weapons to Bahrain without Human Rights Conditions

But first …

******
McGovern Profile Photo 1ab(1)
Jim is a PASSIONATE advocate of human rights! Go, Jim, go!!

From Jim’s office:

Today U.S. Congressman Jim McGovern, a senior House Democrat and the co-chair of the bipartisan Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission, released the following statement in response to media reports that the Trump Administration plans to lift all human rights conditions on U.S. sales of F-16 fighter jets to Bahrain:

“America has a responsibility to stand up for human rights in all countries and our allies must be no exception. Media reports indicate that Secretary of State Rex Tillerson will soon lift all human rights conditions on the sale of F-16 fighter jets to Bahrain are deeply troubling.

“Such a move would be an extremely short-sighted and unprincipled choice that increases the risk of instability in Bahrain and puts America’s long-term security at risk.

“In 2011, after brutally repressing peaceful citizen protests, the Bahraini regime promised the international community and its own citizens that it would start a national dialogue and take steps to satisfy the democratic aspirations of its people.

“While some progress was made, reforms have stalled, and in recent months I’ve received report after report of escalating repression. People have been arrested for tweeting and participating in protests, an opposition party has been dissolved and another has been targeted, and the ranks of political prisoners have grown to include leading clerics.

“Last August, five U.N. human rights rapporteurs issued a joint statement expressing their concern that the Bahraini authorities were engaged in systematic harassment of the majority Shi’a population. There is nothing in Bahrain’s behavior that is deserving of the reward President Trump is reported to be considering.

“Some of those who support this decision say that arms sales should be decided by America’s strategic interests. I agree with their premise, but not with their conclusion. It is simply not in the U.S. strategic interest to support a government whose own actions deepen and harden sectarian divides, and close off opportunities for political solutions to long-standing problems.

“Bahrain’s systematic repression of fundamental rights and constant attacks on people’s human dignity will only feed radicalization in Bahrain, just as it has throughout the region. We should be cooling the embers, not fanning the flames. I strongly oppose the decision of lift conditions on arms sales to Bahrain, and call on the Administration to reverse course immediately before it is too late.”

Go, Mayor Petty, go! Go, America, go!!! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

By Rosalie Tirella

This is how Worcester City Councilor Michael Gaffney describes tomorrow’s rally for refugees and immigrants. His every word toxic, divisive … DELIBERATELY misleading. He’s a bright guy – full of himself – he knows how to make his every word glow evil:

“Joe Petty, the Mayor of Worcester, calls for a mob to descend on our City to coerce local officials to violate their oath of office.”

Calling Joseph P. McCarthy! Calling Joseph P. McCarthy!

This, on the other hand, is how Worcester Mayor Joseph Petty and his office describe the event. Petty is a good, intelligent, sensitive city leader. He’s a great listener, a great bridge-builder between our communities – a perfect fit for the Worcester of 2017: diverse, striving, multi-lingual, up and coming!

20160901_163921-1
pic: R.T.

From the Mayor’s Office:

“Good evening …

“Tomorrow evening, January 31 at 6 PM in front of Worcester City Hall, Mayor Joseph M. Petty, will be addressing a crowd that is peacefully protesting President Trump’s executive actions on immigration and recent, divisive city council orders.

“Hundreds are planning to attend the Solidarity Rally in support of Worcester’s refugees and immigrants.

“The event is sponsored by dozens of organizations.

“All are welcome to attend.”

20170126_161519-1
pic: R.T.

Michael Gaffney, we’re begging you: Get some therapy! You’re not well. The mayoral seat isn’t worth all your scheming, your contorting the truth like a midway pretzel, your scapegoating minority groups … hurting so many people – that means the City of Worcester!

27bierWeb-articleLarge-1

AMERICAN IDEALS – AMERICA! – always in style! (especially in Worcester😄)

27bierWeb-articleLarge-1

TOMORROW! Tuesday, Jan. 31

Before the Worcester City Council meeting!

6 p.m.

WORCESTER CITY HALL – Main Street

BE THERE!

20160520_162823_HDR
pic: R.T.

This demonstration, in support of Worcester’s immigrants and refugees, is to show THE CITY AND THE WORLD that Donald Trump and City Councilor Michael Gaffney’s hate-filled demagoguery has no place in Worcester! They will not score political points with our most vulnerable people – most of them women and children (under 12 years of age!)!

Let’s stop the madness in Worcester!

This demonstration is organized by Showing Up for Racial Justice Worcester. To learn more and sign up, check out their FB page!

Go, Worcester, go!

Go, Mayor Petty, go!

GO, AMERICA, GO!!!!!!!!!

20160704_083559-1
pic: R.T.

– Rosalie Tirella

From Congressman Jim McGovern’s office …

McGovern Announces $836,000 for UMass Medical to Fight Heart Disease

Funds will Support Heart and Vascular Disease Research, push for Cures

Congressman Jim McGovern announced yesterday that UMass Medical School has been awarded $836,858 by the Department of Health and Human Services to support research on treatments and cures for heart and vascular diseases. The new federal funding is awarded through the Community Surveillance of Coronary Heart Disease program, a national HHS effort to invest in medical research at world-class universities like UMass Medical School.

“Heart disease impacts families across the country every year and there has never been a more important time to invest in life-saving medical research. This new federal funding for UMass Medical School will help them continue their cutting-edge medical research that will help save lives while supporting economic growth right here in Massachusetts,” Congressman McGovern said. “I am grateful to HHS Secretary Burwell for making this investment in our community and recognizing UMass Medical School as a leader in the fight against heart disease. Together we can continue to support this important work to help families in Massachusetts and across the country.”

The grant continues the decades-long work of the Worcester Heart Attack Study, funded by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute since the mid-1980s. The community-based study provides 40 years of data about the number of heart attacks among residents of the Greater Worcester community and outcomes of their medical care during and after hospitalization. It also provides insights on how patients who experience heart attacks in the community are treated by physicians.

“We’re going to have a 40-year picture of heart disease, which is unique. What we’ve learned since 1975 is that even though Worcester heart attack patients have become older and sicker, often having multiple diseases, the incidence of heart attacks is declining, and patients’ prognosis both in-hospital and post-discharge is getting better,” said Robert Goldberg, PhD, professor of quantitative health sciences and founder and principal investigator of the renamed Worcester Heart Attack Study. “We think this is because patients are being much more aggressively managed with evidence-based care.

“What we want to learn is will these trajectories continue: will incidence of heart attacks continue to decrease? Will patients’ prognosis continue to improve? And how much more effectively can patients be managed?”

The new funding will help Dr. Goldberg and his research team achieve these goals by monitoring trends of heart attack patients; and patient management.

“Most novel is that we’re going to use bioinformatics and very technical approaches to sift through available medical records, be they in paper or electronic form, and see how machines do compared to our manual abstractors,” Goldberg said. “The goal is to streamline the approach to data collection and data abstraction and give feedback to investigators and clinicians in real time.”

********

McGovern, House Democrats Call for White House to Strengthen Safeguards on “Killer Robots”

House Lawmakers Raise Concerns About New Military Technology

Congressman Jim McGovern led a group of House Democrats yesterday in a letter to Secretary of State John Kerry and Defense Secretary Ash Carter to push for meaningful human control as a safeguard on lethal autonomous weapons systems, also known as fully autonomous weapons or so-called “killer robots – an emerging and concerning military technology.

The letter comes ahead of the upcoming Fifth Review Conference of the Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW) to be held at the United Nations in Geneva on December 12-16, 2016. The CCW is five-year Review Conference and will focus on lethal autonomous weapons systems.

In today’s letter to the Obama Administration, Congressman McGovern and House Democrats write that these weapons “would constitute a new method of warfare – and one that would not be for the betterment of humankind. Once activated, these weapons would be able to select and attack targets without any further human involvement. While these weapons do not yet exist, technology is racing ahead, and experts say that they could be procured within years, not decades.”

Joining Congressman McGovern on yesterday’s letter to the White House were Representatives Barbara Lee (D-CA), Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), Alan Grayson (D-FL), Mark Pocan (D-WI), John Conyers (D-MI), John Lewis (D-GA), Raul Grijalva (D-AZ), and Maxine Waters (D-CA).

The lawmakers expressed their support of “the call for a preemptive prohibition on the development, production, and use of fully autonomous weapons. This call has been endorsed by thousands of artificial intelligence and robotics experts, including many of the most respected people in those fields, as well as two dozen Nobel peace Laureates, more than 100 prominent faith leaders, numerous humanitarian organizations and many more. This prohibition, which should require meaningful human control over target selection and engagement for each individual attack, could be achieved as a new CCW protocol.”

In the letter, McGovern and House Democrats called on the Obama Administration to take the following actions at the CCW Review Conference next week:

· The U.S. should strongly support the continuation of discussions in the CCW on the legal, ethical, technological, proliferation, international security, and other challenges raised by what the CCW calls “lethal autonomous weapons systems.”

· The U.S. should strongly and unequivocally support the recommendation agreed to by CCW members, including the United States, in April that states establish a Group of Governmental Experts (GGE) at this Review Conference to continue these deliberations next year. The creation of an open-ended GGE would move the CCW discussions from informal to the more appropriate formal status, and indicate that the CCW is making progress on the issue and intends to produce a result. Such groups have been the CCW’s established method of work for the past two decades to address explosive remnants of war, landmines and cluster munitions. The U.S. agreed to the recommendation in April with reluctance, and at an August meeting, the U.S. indicated its preference is to continue the process using the current format of informal meetings. Given the uncertainty on advancing arms control measures, support for proceeding to the more formal process seems warranted.

· The U.S. should propose an ambitious mandate for CCW work in 2017, one that states that CCW deliberations in 2017 should be carried out with a view to formal negotiations on lethal autonomous weapons systems in the future.

· The U.S. should propose that the CCW commits to at least four weeks of time for its deliberations on lethal autonomous weapons systems in 2017. In the past, the CCW has only made progress on issues when it devoted such an amount of time.

The Full Text of the Letter to the Obama Administration:

December 8, 2016

The Honorable John F. Kerry Ashton B. Carter
Secretary of State Secretary of Defense
U.S. Department of State U.S. Department of Defense
Washington, DC 20520 Washington, DC 20301-1400

Dear Secretaries Kerry and Carter,

We are writing with respect to the upcoming Fifth Review Conference of the Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW) to be held at the United Nations in Geneva on December 12-16, 2016.

The main focus of this five-year Review Conference will be lethal autonomous weapons systems, also known as fully autonomous weapons or so-called “killer robots.” The high contracting parties, including the United States, will decide whether to continue discussions on this issue in the CCW, and if so, what the format, content, objective and duration of the talks should be.

We believe that fully autonomous weapons are a matter of vital concern. They would not simply be another weapon in the world’s arsenals, but would constitute a new method of warfare – and one that would not be for the betterment of humankind. Once activated, these weapons would be able to select and attack targets without any further human involvement. While these weapons do not yet exist, technology is racing ahead, and experts say that they could be procured within years, not decades.

We support the call for a preemptive prohibition on the development, production, and use of fully autonomous weapons. This call has been endorsed by thousands of artificial intelligence and robotics experts, including many of the most respected people in those fields, as well as two dozen Nobel peace Laureates, more than 100 prominent faith leaders, numerous humanitarian organizations and many more.

This prohibition, which should require meaningful human control over target selection and engagement for each individual attack, could be achieved as a new CCW protocol. The CCW has already taken similar action on one weapon, namely preemptively banning blinding laser weapons through its Protocol IV.

We urge that at the CCW Review Conference in December the U.S. delegation take the following actions:

· The U.S. should strongly support the continuation of discussions in the CCW on the legal, ethical, technological, proliferation, international security, and other challenges raised by what the CCW calls “lethal autonomous weapons systems.”

· The U.S. should strongly and unequivocally support the recommendation agreed to by CCW members, including the United States, in April that states establish a Group of Governmental Experts (GGE) at this Review Conference to continue these deliberations next year. The creation of an open-ended GGE would move the CCW discussions from informal to the more appropriate formal status, and indicate that the CCW is making progress on the issue and intends to produce a result. Such groups have been the CCW’s established method of work for the past two decades to address explosive remnants of war, landmines and cluster munitions. The U.S. agreed to the recommendation in April with reluctance, and at an August meeting, the U.S. indicated its preference is to continue the process using the current format of informal meetings. Given the uncertainty on advancing arms control measures, support for proceeding to the more formal process seems warranted.

· The U.S. should propose an ambitious mandate for CCW work in 2017, one that states that CCW deliberations in 2017 should be carried out with a view to formal negotiations on lethal autonomous weapons systems in the future.

· The U.S. should propose that the CCW commits to at least four weeks of time for its deliberations on lethal autonomous weapons systems in 2017. In the past, the CCW has only made progress on issues when it devoted such an amount of time.

In closing, we would like to stress that we recognize the importance of artificial intelligence and robotics to the future of the U.S. military, and their central role in the Pentagon’s Third Offset Strategy, but we firmly believe that there must always be meaningful human control over critical combat functions.

Sincerely, …

*******

Bipartisan McGovern Human Rights Bill Passes Congress

McGovern Bill Will Crack Down on Corruption and Human Rights Abuses Around the World

McGovern Urges Trump to Continue U.S. Leadership on Human Rights

Congressman Jim McGovern this week applauded Congressional passage of the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act, a bill he co-authored to crack down on corruption and human rights abuses around the world. … Congressman McGovern is one of four co-sponsors of the bipartisan legislation along with Senators John McCain (R-AZ) and Ben Cardin (D-MD) and Representative Chris Smith (R-NJ). The bill now goes to President Obama’s desk for his signature.

“America must stand up for human rights at home and abroad. With today’s passage of the Global Magnitsky Act, Republicans and Democrats came together to continue America’s leadership on human rights around the world,” Congressman McGovern said. “This bill will empower the president to deny U.S. visas and freeze U.S.-based assets of human rights abusers and corrupt foreign officials. I urge President Obama to sign this important bill into law. This is an important step, but there is still much more work ahead.”

“During the campaign, two words I never heard Donald Trump utter were ‘human rights’ and that should concern all of us. President-elect Trump has repeatedly praised Vladimir Putin and other world leaders guilty of brutal crackdowns on dissidents. Since his election, President-elect Trump has continued to raise red flags about his approach to political opponents. … Americans need a leader who will stand up for the freedoms our country was founded on and I hope President-elect Trump proves his critics wrong and uses the new tools in this bill to bring the leadership we need on human rights.”

The Global Magnitsky Act allows the president to deny U.S. visas and freeze U.S.-based assets of human rights abusers and corrupt foreign officials. It also directs the president to consider information from NGOs when determining who to sanction. Members of Congress and certain assistant secretaries of state may also recommend names for sanction. The president is required to make public the names of individuals being targeted.

Congressman McGovern has been a leading voice in the call for U.S. leadership and action to strengthen human rights across the world, including in Russia. Congressman McGovern is one of the authors of the Sergei Magnitsky Rule of Law Accountability Act, legislation passed by both the U.S. House and Senate in 2012 to establish a critical precedent that human rights must be an essential component of trade legislation.

The Magnitsky Bill was named after Sergei Leonidovich Magnitsky, a Russian lawyer and auditor who worked for Hermitage Capital Management. Magnitsky’s arrest and subsequent death while in Russian custody triggered both official and unofficial inquiries into allegations of fraud, theft, and human rights violations.

 

Worcester news you can use …

THE INFORMED IMMIGRANT

image029

“Informed Immigrant” is a continuously updated resource website for immigrants and allies across the United States.

Please share!

As the Informed Immigrant website states,

Current resources include:

A compilation of frequently asked questions on topics that include legal support, employment, DACA, deportation defense and more

A National Immigration Law Center (NILC) fact sheet on the rights of everyone living in the United States, regardless of status

A list of search tools and hotlines to help identify appropriate legal services

A running list of immigrant rights & services organizations across the United States

Informed Immigrant was put together by Asian Americans Advancing Justice – AAJC, Center for Community Change, FWD.us, National Immigration Law Center, SEIU, and United We Dream, among other organizations.

The site is also offered in Spanish (Korean coming soon).

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS & ANSWERS FOR IMMIGRANTS IN THE U.S.:

These FAQs provide information and recommendations that may help you prepare once President-elect Donald Trump takes office on January 20, 2017.

The information is on what we know today. We will continue to update it with more information once we have it.

Please note that the information is not legal advice.

Every person’s situation is different, and you should talk to a qualified immigration lawyer or a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA)–accredited representative so that you can make the most informed decision for yourself.

The Questions:

1. I do not have DACA. Should I apply for it now?

2. I already have DACA. Should I apply to renew my DACA?

3. What will happen to DACA under the next administration?

4. What will happen to the information on DACA applications?

5. If my DACA is terminated, will I be able to work?

6. I have DACA and want to travel outside the United States. Is it safe to travel?

7. If I am undocumented and think I may be eligible for an immigration benefit, should I apply now?

8. I am undocumented and I have a U.S. citizen child. Is there anything I can do to protect myself?

9. What are my rights if ICE stops me in the street or my house?

10. Where am I safe from ICE enforcement actions?

11. How can the community report any ICE activities in violation of these policies?

12. Is it safe for me to protest and march in rallies?

13. What are sanctuary cities?

14. What will happen to sanctuary policies under the next administration?

* To learn the answers to these questions CLICK HERE!!!

www.informedimmigrant.com

*******

WORCESTER PUBLIC LIBRARY WAIVES YOUR LIBRARY FINES FOR HOLIDAY FOOD DONATIONS!

20160831_142652-1-1-1

The Worcester Public Library Trades Food for Fines During the Entire Month of December

At Main Branch, 3 Salem Square, Worcester

As part of the program, the library will be accepting donations of non-perishable food items.

For patrons with overdue library fines, every food item will equal $1 removed from their account.

Collected food will be donated to the Worcester County Food Bank.

“Unfortunately, there are still people right here in Worcester who don’t have enough to eat, and it’s up to all of us to help change that,” said City Manager Edward M. Augustus, Jr. “Whether or not you have any overdue books, I hope you’ll join me in helping the Worcester County Food Bank help the needy in our community.”

The items will be collected at the Main Library, 3 Salem Square, Worcester.

For every food item donated, $1 will be removed from the overdue fines on the patron’s account.

“This program is a win-win,” said Head Librarian Geoffrey Dickinson. “Holding a Food for Fines program at the Worcester Public Library allows us to offer those patrons who may have lost access to library services (from excessive overdue fees) an opportunity to regain their privileges by “paying” with food rather than cash. It also helps the community by collecting much needed food for the Worcester County Food Bank.”

The Worcester Food Bank’s list of recommended items includes cereal, rice, beans, soup, stew, chili, dry and canned pasta, macaroni and cheese, canned fruits and vegetables, canned tuna and chicken, and peanut butter and jelly. The library will not be able to accept food items in glass containers, home-canned items, opened foods, or foods past their expiration dates.

For more information on the Worcester Public Library and a complete list of events and programs visit mywpl.org.

Jim parked in Rose’s space … McGovern Calls on Trump to Make Human Rights a Top Priority

From The New York Times:

20kristof_cartoon-articlelarge

From Stephen Colbert:

********

McGovern at Tufts University Addresses U.S.-Russia Relations, Need for Strong American Leadership on Human Rights Around the World

U.S. Congressman Jim McGovern (D-MA) called on President-Elect Donald Trump to make human rights a top priority in his administration. At a discussion at The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University with William Browder, CEO of Hermitage Capital Management, McGovern spoke about the future of U.S.-Russia relations seen through the lens of human rights abuses by the Russian government and its impact on business and trade.

“During the campaign, two words I never heard Donald Trump utter were ‘human rights.’ Quite frankly, that worries me,” Congressman McGovern said. “I hope, as our next president, that human rights in Russia and around the world will become a major part of our foreign policy.

Congressman McGovern has been a leading voice in the call for U.S. leadership and action to strengthen human rights across the world, including in Russia. Congressman McGovern is one of the authors of the Sergei Magnitsky Rule of Law Accountability Act, legislation passed by both the U.S. House and Senate in 2012 to establish a critical precedent that human rights must be an essential component of trade legislation.

The Magnitsky Bill was named after Sergei Leonidovich Magnitsky, a Russian lawyer and auditor who worked for Hermitage Capital Management. Magnitsky’s arrest and subsequent death while in Russian custody triggered both official and unofficial inquiries into allegations of fraud, theft, and human rights violations. Mr. Browder, an international human rights crusader, wrote the New York Times bestseller Red Notice: A True Story of High Finance, Murder, and One Man’s Fight for Justice based on these experiences.

“The United States is not above criticism when it comes to human rights. But we remain the best hope for so many around the world who are oppressed. We must not turn our backs on bad behavior – either from our adversaries or our allies,” Congressman McGovern added.

“The Magnitsky bill is not anti-Russian people – it’s anti-Russian corruption, murder and oppression. We should continue to have a constructive relationship with the Russian government. But we should not turn a blind eye; we should not be indifferent; and we should not rationalize or explain away the type of behavior that resulted in the death of Sergei.

“Going forward, will the fact that there has been strong Republican support for the use of sanctions matter? Like most sanctions legislation, the Magnitsky law is discretionary; it authorizes but does not require the president to impose sanctions on those whose names the Congress forwards. The decisions the new president takes on Magnitsky sanctions will send a clear message as to the importance he places on human rights and the fight against corruption in Russia and globally.”

******

Full text of Congressman McGovern’s speech:

“Good evening. It is a great pleasure to be here tonight, and to be sharing the stage once again with my good friend Bill Browder, who has worked tirelessly to bring corrupt officials and human rights violators to justice in Russia and around the world.

“I especially want to thank Tufts University and the Fletcher School for hosting this important event. In two short months a new president will be sworn in whose foreign policy positions, including those on Russia, are simply unclear. So it is a good time to be discussing the U.S. relationship with countries like Russia, where concerns about human rights and corruption are often at the forefront.

“I’d like to take a few minutes to remind you of the origins of the Sergei Magnitsky Rule of Law Accountability Act of 2012 that is in effect for Russia, and its sister legislation, the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act, that I cosponsored in January 2015 and is currently being considered in the Congress.

“As you will hear today, this all started when Bill Browder began to expose corruption in the Russian economy, which led to him being declared a threat to Russia’s national security, and got his company raided and fraudulently transferred to state control. Bill hired a Russian lawyer, Sergei Magnitsky, to investigate what was going on. Sergei’s investigation uncovered a $230 million dollar fraud committed by Russian government officials – but it was Sergei, not the corrupt officials, who was arrested. He was held for 358 days, tortured, and eventually beaten to death in 2009. He was 37 years old.

“This terrible experience led Bill to start a global campaign to expose endemic corruption and human rights abuses in Russia. He brought this cause to the U.S. Congress, and that led to the Justice for Sergei Magnitsky Act which Sen. Ben Cardin and I introduced in September 2010. There wasn’t enough time to move the bill in the 111th Congress, so we reintroduced in the 112th, and the Magnitsky Act was passed in December 2012.

“The Act directs the President to identify individuals responsible for the detention, abuse or death of Sergei, or of other Russians seeking to expose illegal activity by Russian officials, or otherwise defend human rights. The people on the list then become ineligible for U.S. visas, any current visas are revoked, their U.S. assets are frozen and any transactions involving U.S. property are prohibited. As of today, 39 people have been sanctioned under this law, including many of those directly involved in Sergei’s death.
Of course, corruption and human rights violations do not only occur in Russia. People continually bring new cases of rights abuses or corrupt practices to my attention, from places all over the world – Syria, Tibet, Burma, Turkey, Sudan, Bahrain, Guatemala, to name just a few. This is why, when we started working on the Sergei Magnitsky Act, we wanted it to have global reach.

“But because that didn’t happen in 2012, I introduced the Global Magnitsky bill during the current Congress, together with my colleague Rep. Chris Smith. I remain hopeful that Global Magnitsky will be passed yet this year as part of the National Defense Authorization Act. If so, we will have achieved an important victory.

“It’s important to recognize that the Magnitsky legislation is not a substitute for strengthening rule of law in the countries where human rights abuses and corruption are occurring. We should all work for the day when judicial systems at the national level are strong enough and independent enough to investigate and punish the people who use their positions of power to repress their citizens’ most basic rights, or to enrich themselves at public expense. What Magnitsky legislation allows us to do is prevent people who are responsible for abuses from benefitting by coming to our country and doing business here.

“This approach, this way of contributing to ensure some kind of accountability for terrible abuses, has strong bipartisan support. When I first introduced the Justice for Sergei Magnitsky Act in the House in September 2010, I only had three co-sponsors. When I reintroduced the bill in April 2012, it garnered 80 cosponsors, showing growing bipartisan support. In December 2012, the bill passed the House by a vote of 363-45. The Global Magnitsky bill has also had strong support on both sides of the aisle.

“One big question going forward is whether the new Administration will continue to use the Magnitsky and other sanctions authorities to communicate to foreign governments that the United States will oppose human rights abuses and corruption.

“Let me be clear that in my view, many more people in Russia could have and should have been sanctioned by President Obama under Magnitsky. Doing so would have been consistent with the focus in the U.S. National Security Strategy on building rule of law, combatting corruption and protecting and strengthening human rights. But at least the current Administration has implemented some sanctions.

“Going forward, will the fact that there has been strong Republican support for the use of sanctions matter? Like most sanctions legislation, the Magnitsky law is discretionary; it authorizes but does not require the president to impose sanctions on those whose names the Congress forwards. The decisions the new president takes on Magnitsky sanctions will send a clear message as to the importance he places on human rights and the fight against corruption in Russia and globally.

“I have always believed in engaging other governments, even those with which we have strong disagreements. But engagement without attention to accountability feeds the kinds of internal conditions in countries that can lead to marginalization, radicalization, and internal uprisings whose consequences spill over borders. Sanctions take time to be effective, and by themselves may not be sufficient to change behavior. But it would be irresponsible for the United States not to use all the tools it has to foster the good behavior of states internally and internationally.

“The story of Sergei Magnitsky is a tragedy. It is an outrage. The Russian government had hoped we would all just forget and move on. We didn’t – and as someone who cares deeply about human rights, I’m glad we didn’t. The Magnitsky law is not perfect, but it sent a clear message that there would be a consequence for those who are corrupt and commit human rights violations.

“The United States is not above criticism when it comes to human rights. But we remain the best hope for so many around the world who are oppressed. We must not turn our backs on bad behavior – either from our adversaries or our allies.

“The Magnitsky bill is not anti-Russian people – it’s anti-Russian corruption, murder and oppression. We should continue to have a constructive relationship with the Russian government. But we should not turn a blind eye; we should not be indifferent; and we should not rationalize or explain away the type of behavior that resulted in the death of Sergei.

“During the campaign, two words I never heard Donald Trump utter were “human rights.” Quite frankly, that worries me. I hope, as our next president, that human rights in Russia and around the world will become a major part of our foreign policy.

Congressman McGovern leads 72 lawmakers in call for President Obama to make Tibet a priority in final months in office

Congressman Jim McGovern led a group of 72 House lawmakers this week in a letter calling on President Obama to make Tibet a priority in his final months in office.

Congressman McGovern has been a leading voice in Congress pushing for the United States to do more to support reforms that would strengthen human rights in Tibet.

In November 2015, Congressman McGovern joined Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi and other lawmakers on a trip to China and Tibet to urge Chinese leaders to enact reforms to increase the freedom and autonomy of the Tibetan people.

“We write to ask that you redouble efforts in support of the Tibetan people during your remaining months in office. We believe it is critically important to move beyond words to actions,” McGovern and House lawmakers wrote in the letter to President Obama. “The Tibetan people view the United States as their friend. It is time to honor that friendship with new, creative strategies to encourage meaningful dialogue, protect Tibetan rights, and preserve their unique cultural, religious and linguistic identity.”

In the letter to President Obama, Congressman McGovern and House lawmakers call for:

· U.S. government officials to invite the Dalai Lama to every event, on every occasion, where his knowledge and decades of reflections would be helpful for addressing the world’s problems.

· U.S. government officials to facilitate the involvement of the Dalai Lama or his representatives in the global debate on climate change and its potential consequences given Tibet’s fragile environment, rapid warming, and critically important reserves of freshwater.

· The establishment of a U.S. consular office in Lhasa, Tibet to help the U.S. observe and address the obstacles to freedom of movement that affect both Tibetans within China, and U.S. citizens, including Tibetan-Americans, who seek to travel to Tibetan areas of China.

· The U.S. government to publicly support the right of the Dalai Lama to return to Tibet

· President Obama to publically and regularly call for the immediate and unconditional release of all Tibetan political prisoners held by the People’s Republic of China whose cases have been documented by the Congressional-Executive Commission on China.

· Support reciprocity legislation that would ensure that the senior Chinese officials responsible for the policy that restricts the access of U.S. officials, journalists, Tibetan-Americans and other citizens to Tibetan areas of the country are themselves restricted in their travel when they are in the United States.

Joining Congressman McGovern on the letter to President Obama were Congressman Eliot Engel (D-NY), Ranking Member on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Nita Lowey (D-NY), Ranking Member on the House Appropriations Committee, as well as Representatives Betty McCollum (D-MN), Alan Lowenthal (D-CA), Ted Lieu (D-CA), Joyce Beatty (D-OH), Tim Walz (D-MN), Jim McDermott (D-WA), Michael Capuano (D-MA), Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.), Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), Bill Pascrell, Jr. (D-NJ), Richard Neal (D-MA), Joe Courtney (D-CT), David Cicilline (D-RI), Peter Welch (D-VT), Mike Thompson (D-CA), Loretta Sanchez (D-CA), Barbara Lee (D-CA), Lloyd Doggett (D-TX), Steve Cohen (D-TN), Dan Kildee (D-MI), Marcy Kaptur (D-OH), John Garamendi (D-CA), Doris Matsui (D-CA), Jared Polis (D-CO), William Keating (D-MA), Jose Serrano (D-NY), Nydia Velazquex (D-NY), Rosa DeLauro (D-CT), Louise Slaughter (D-NY), Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), Tim Ryan (D-OH), Luis Gutierrez (D-IL), Gerald Connolly (D-VA), Matt Cartwright (D-PA), Gene Green (D-TX), Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), Pedro Pierluisi (D-P.R.), Mark Takano (D-CA), Mark Pocan (D-WI), Michael Honda (D-CA), Steve Israel (D-NY), Andre Carson (D-IN), Peter DeFazio (D-OR), Sam Farr (D-CA), Donna Edwards (D-MD), Niki Tsongas (D-MA), John Yarmuth (D-KY), John Lewis (D-GA), Anna Eshoo (D-CA), Mark Desaulnier (CA), Jerry McNerney (CA), Charles Rangel (D-NY), Joseph Kennedy III (D-MA), Danny Davis (D-IL), Donald Beyer (D-VA), Bobby Rush (D-IL), Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), Keith Ellison (D-MN), John Larson (D-CT), Stephen Lynch (D-MA), Sander Levin (D-MI), Raul Grijalva (D-AZ), Albio Sires (D-NJ), Ann Kuster (D-NH), Jim Langevin (D-RI), Maxine Waters (D-CA), Joe Crowley (D-NY), Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), and Juan Vargas (D-CA).

The full text of the letter is below:

August 17, 2016

The Honorable Barack Obama
President of the United States of America
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500

Dear President Obama,

In June, His Holiness the Dalai Lama visited Washington. Prior to his meeting with you, he came to Capitol Hill, where he spoke of his genuine friendship with Members of Congress, thanked the United States for its staunch support for Tibet over many decades, and described America as the leading nation in the free world. It was an honor and a pleasure to be in his company, but his visit was also a reminder of how little progress has been made in addressing the grievances of the Tibetan people. It is for this reason that we write to ask that you redouble efforts in support of the Tibetan people during your remaining months in office.

Since the 1980s, the Congress has often spoken out for the Tibetan people. The purpose of the Tibetan Policy Act of 2002 (TPA), the principal legislation guiding U.S. policy toward Tibet, is “to support the aspirations of the Tibetan people to safeguard their distinct identity” through substantive dialogue between the government of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and the Dalai Lama or his representatives. The position of Special Coordinator for Tibetan Issues established by the TPA is called upon to “vigorously promote the policy of seeking to protect the distinct religious, cultural, linguistic, and national identity of Tibet,” and to press for “improved respect for human rights.” Last summer, the Congress passed House Resolution 337, which recognized the Dalai Lama’s 80th birthday and reaffirmed the TPA policy framework, calling on the U.S. government to redouble its efforts to encourage substantive dialogue, stalled since 2010, and to oppose PRC interference in the reincarnation process.

The State Department’s next annual report to the Congress on Tibet negotiations in the framework of the TPA is due shortly. But unfortunately, we can already anticipate the content: meetings and conversations will have been held, including your June meeting with the Dalai Lama, high-level public and private statements will have been made, and note may be taken of State Department reports that document the human rights situation in Tibetan areas of China. But in the end, the dialogue will not have resumed and no concrete achievements will be identified.
We understand that it is the government of the PRC, not that of the United States, that is the principle obstacle to progress on redressing the grievances of the Tibetan people. But as the Dalai Lama celebrates his 81st birthday, our concern about the future is growing.
During his meetings on the Hill, His Holiness recalled the Tibetan commitment to non-violence and reiterated that his people are seeking autonomy within, not independence from, China. He emphasized that the philosophy underpinning Tibetan Buddhism has much to offer China and the world, and spoke at length about the global environmental importance of the Tibetan plateau. He contrasted the democratic practices of the Tibetan people with the wartime mentality and the immense corruption that have infected China’s approach to governance. We believe his words suggest new opportunities that could be pursued within the framework of the TPA.

First, the U.S. government should invite the Dalai Lama to every event, on every occasion, where his knowledge and decades of reflections would be helpful for addressing the world’s problems. The Dalai Lama is a world spiritual and philosophical leader who is well-positioned to contribute to global debates on religious tolerance and countering violent extremism, on the conceptual foundations and uses of non-violence, and on building peace in war-torn countries, among other topics. Tibetan Buddhists should be included in U.S.-supported initiatives to foster cross-cultural understanding and tolerance.

Second, the U.S. government should facilitate the involvement of the Dalai Lama or his representatives in the global debate on climate change and its potential consequences. Climate change, one of the few topics on which the U.S. and China have found common ground, is of great concern for Tibet, given its fragile environment, rapid warming, and critically important reserves of freshwater. For its part, the Chinese leadership has acknowledged at the highest levels the scale of the environmental crisis it faces. Conserving the Tibetan plateau is surely a shared interest, one that can only be achieved with the full participation of the Tibetan people within and outside China… the transnational democratic experience of the Central Tibet Administration (CTA) should be highlighted in U.S. government initiatives that promote democratic governance

Third, the transnational democratic experience of the Central Tibet Administration (CTA) should be highlighted in U.S. government initiatives that promote democratic governance. The CTA’s recent elections, in which Dr. Lobsang Sangay was reelected as Sikyong and the 45-member Assembly of the Tibetan People’s Deputies was selected, were carried out over several months in more than 30 countries with the participation of tens of thousands of people. This electoral process stands in sharp contrast to China’s authoritarian practices and offers an interesting, innovative model in an increasingly globalized world.

Mr. President, we welcome your expressions of support for the preservation of Tibet’s unique religious, cultural and linguistic traditions, and the equal protection of human rights of Tibetans in China, and your recognition of Dalai Lama’s efforts to raise awareness of the importance of limiting global warming, including protecting the Himalayan glaciers and environment on the Tibetan plateau. But we believe it is critically important to move beyond words to actions.

Initiatives like those we have described that underscore the relevance of the Tibetan experience for world affairs should complement renewed and more robust efforts to fully implement the TPA. In this regard, we strongly encourage your Administration, during the remaining months of your term in office, to focus on establishing a consular office in Lhasa. Such a presence is critical for observing and addressing the obstacles to freedom of movement that affect both Tibetans within China, and U.S. citizens, including Tibetan-Americans, who seek to travel to Tibetan areas of China.

As you are surely aware, although the U.S. government allows journalists and other citizens of the PRC to travel freely within the United States, the Chinese government restricts the access of U.S. officials, journalists, Tibetan-Americans and other citizens to Tibetan areas of the country. Legislation pending in Congress would address this problem by making those senior Chinese officials responsible for the policy ineligible to receive visas to enter the United States, on the premise that reciprocity forms the basis of diplomatic engagement between countries. Pending passage of such legislation, nothing precludes your Administration from implementing a policy of reciprocity now, or tying Chinese access to United States territory to the opening of a consular presence in Lhasa.

In addition, the U.S. government should publicly support the right of the Dalai Lama to return to Tibet. In accordance with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which China voted for in 1948, everyone has the right to leave and return to his own country.

Finally, we strongly urge you to publically and regularly call for the immediate and unconditional release of all Tibetan political prisoners held by the PRC whose cases have been documented by the Congressional-Executive Commission on China.

Mr. President, the Tibetan people view the United States as their friend. It is time to honor that friendship with new, creative strategies to encourage meaningful dialogue, protect Tibetan rights, and preserve their unique cultural, religious and linguistic identity. We respectfully request that you exercise your leadership on this matter.

Congressman McGovern Meets Dalai Lama, Renews Call for Strengthening Human Rights in Tibet

image004
Jim and the Dalai Lama! Human rights for ALL people!

WASHINGTON, D.C. – With the Dalai Lama visiting the United States this week, Congressman Jim McGovern led a group of lawmakers on the House floor on Monday, June 13th in a tribute to the leader of Tibet, calling for action to strengthen human rights in Tibet. Click here for video of Congressman McGovern’s opening remarks on the House floor.

“As we seek to comprehend the senseless violence of the massacre of at least 49 people yesterday in Orlando, and the wounding of more than 50 others – most members of the LGBT community, many of Hispanic descent, all just out trying to enjoy their lives on a Saturday night – I can think of no better source of words of wisdom, tolerance and peace than His Holiness the Dalai Lama,” Congressman McGovern said on the House floor. “He has consistently advocated policies of non-violence, even in the face of extreme aggression. In 1989 he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for his non-violent struggle for the liberation of Tibet. His is a voice of tolerance.”

On Tuesday, June 14th, Congressman McGovern joined House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi and other lawmakers in a meeting with the Dalai Lama in the U.S. Capitol.

This follows a November 2015 trip taken by McGovern, Pelosi, and other lawmakers to Tibet and China to keep a spotlight on human rights issues in Tibet.

“I have been inspired by the Tibetan people and outraged by the Chinese government’s treatment of them. To be blunt – it is unconscionable, and it is worsening,” McGovern added in his speech on the House floor. “We need to be doing something different. We need to have the guts to take some action. The Dalai Lama is praised and admired around the world, with heads of state and international organizations declaring how much they care about Tibet and worry about abuses against the Tibetan people. But nothing changes.

“We must all come together now to change the status quo, to change the game the Chinese government has been playing for so many decades. The situation is urgent – it can wait no longer. And shame on us if we stand by, with empty words, and continue to watch the people of Tibet suffer, and their culture, religion and way of life be exterminated, day by day, year by year, until nothing is left.

“As we welcome the Dalai Lama to Washington, I call on my government, my colleagues in this Chamber, the Tibetan diaspora and all Americans to come together, to be creative, to imagine a world that respects and honors the ancient Tibetan culture, and to act on that vision.”

Full Text of Congressman McGovern’s Speech is Below:

“This week Washington is blessed by the presence of His Holiness the 14th Dalai Lama, Tenzin Gyatso, who is visiting the city June 12th through the 16th for several events and meetings. This visit provides us not only the opportunity to listen to the Dalai Lama speak about the modern world and confronting conflict, but also to take a look at the crisis facing Tibet and the Tibetan people, and to ask why the United States is not doing more to protect the rights and support the autonomy of Tibetan people.

“As we seek to comprehend the senseless violence of the massacre of at least 49 people yesterday in Orlando, and the wounding of more than 50 others – most members of the LGBT community, many of Hispanic descent, all just out trying to enjoy their lives on a Saturday night – I can think of no better source of words of wisdom, tolerance and peace than His Holiness the Dalai Lama.

A few words on the Dalai Lama

“By way of welcoming the Dalai Lama, I would like to say a few words about him and his leadership.

“The Dalai Lama, the spiritual leader of Tibet, describes himself as a simple Buddhist monk. He was recognized as the reincarnation of the previous 13th Dalai Lama when he was only two years old, and he was only six when he began his monastic studies.

“But years before he finished his education, when he was still a teenager, he was called upon to assume full political power after China’s invasion of Tibet in 1950. When in 1954 he went to Beijing for peace talks with Mao Zedong and other Chinese leaders, he was not yet 20. Five years later, with the brutal suppression of the Tibetan national uprising in Lhasa by Chinese troops, the Dalai Lama was forced to escape into exile. Since 1959 he has been living in Dharamsala in northern India – that’s more than 60 years of exile.

“I’ve had the opportunity to meet the Dalai Lama on a number of occasions. He is a warm, generous, compassionate man with a great sense of humor.

“He is also a man of peace. He has consistently advocated policies of non-violence, even in the face of extreme aggression. In 1989 he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for his non-violent struggle for the liberation of Tibet. He has received over 150 awards, honorary doctorates, and prizes, in recognition of his messages of peace, non-violence, inter-religious understanding, universal responsibility and compassion. His is a voice for tolerance.

“Unfortunately, as we all know, Tibet has not been liberated. In the late 1990s, under the Dalai Lama’s leadership, the Tibetan people formally put aside the goal of recuperating their independence. Since then, they have been fighting – peacefully — for their autonomy within China.

“But that struggle is not going very well today. And part of the reason it’s not going well is that the international community today is more interested in not offending China than in vigorously supporting the human rights of the Tibetan people. It seems to me that my own government has fallen into this trap.

“I am looking forward to the Dalai Lama’s visit this week, and I know that the leadership of the House and my colleagues on both sides of the aisle will welcome him with the greatest appreciation. But it’s easy to praise the Dalai Lama, meet with him, and benefit from his teachings, yet not lift a finger to help the people of Tibet. The Dalai Lama, and the Tibetan people, deserve better.

Tibetan Democracy

“The Tibetan people are setting a democratic example for the world.

“The Dalai Lama’s own values and commitments are deeply democratic. He has consistently argued for democratic forms of government for the Tibetan people.

“The Charter of Tibetans in Exile, which dates from the 1960s, enshrines freedom of speech, belief, assembly and movement. Today, in an example for the whole world, the political leadership of the Tibetan people living outside of China is in the hands of democratically-elected officials.

“Every five years, in two rounds of voting, the tens of thousands of Tibetans who live in more than 30 countries outside of China elect both the Sikyong, the political leader of the Central Tibetan Administration, and the 45 members of the Assembly of the Tibetan People’s Deputies. The most recent election cycle began last October, with two candidates, the incumbent and a challenger, competing for Sikyong and 94 candidates competing for seats in the 16th Tibetan Parliament.

“The final round of voting was held on March 20, complete with the presence of an observation mission of the International Network of Parliamentarians on Tibet and the International Campaign for Tibet. Election results were announced in late April. Of the 90,000 Tibetans registered, more than 59,000 voted.

“I would like to take this opportunity to congratulate Dr. Lobsang Sangay on his reelection as Sikyong, as well as the 45 newly elected members of the Tibetan parliament.

“This election, conducted all around the world, reflects Tibetans’ strong commitment to democracy, and sets an example for China.

November 2015 CODEL

“Last November I had the honor of joining Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi and my colleagues Joyce Beatty, Ted Lieu, Alan Lowenthal, Betty McCollum and Timothy Walz on an historic Congressional delegation to Tibet, Beijing and Hong Kong.

“I have long raised concerns about China’s human rights record in Tibet. As the first Congressional delegation to enter Tibet since the 2008 unrest, our trip was an important opportunity to raise the voices of the Tibetan people, and we did just that.

“Everywhere we went, in every meeting we had, we talked about Tibet; we talked about the Dalai Lama and his strong bipartisan support in Congress; we talked about the importance of respect for people’s culture and religion; and we talked about the need to strengthen and protect all the human rights of the Tibetan people.

“During the delegation visit, we felt we had a good exchange with Chinese officials and, especially, with university students, both in Tibet and Beijing. We saw our trip, and especially the delegation’s visit to Tibet, as an important gesture by the Chinese government. But it was also clear to us that our visit was only a first step, and that much more needs to be done. Since our return, we have been looking for ways to build on our visit, and to advance the reforms needed for meaningful change.

“Here are some of the things we identified that need to happen, specifically with regard to Tibet:

· The United States needs to open a consulate in Lhasa, Tibet.
· More Members of Congress, more journalists, more members of parliament from other nations, and more people in general – including members of the Tibetan community here in the United States – need to be allowed to travel freely to Tibet.
· Tibetans in China need to be able to travel freely, as well.
· The dialogue between Beijing and the Dalai Lama to resolve longstanding issues of Tibetan autonomy, religious practice, culture, language and heritage needs to be renewed.

“I came away from our visit believing even more strongly that the Dalai Lama is part of the solution to resolving Tibetan grievances.

“Too often during our trip, we heard from some — not all, but some — Chinese officials, expressions and characterizations of Tibet and the Dalai Lama showing that people’s minds and imaginations are stuck in the past, in old prejudices. This concerned me greatly. The issue is not the past. The issue is the future of Tibet and its people.

“Renewing dialogue must be genuine and productive, and it cannot be just another guise for wasting time or going through the motions. We need to see a dialogue based on good faith and the mutual need to resolve outstanding issues in a way that is acceptable to all parties.

“Undertaking such an initiative would be a positive reflection on the capacity of Chinese authorities to engage in constructive dialogue, and would increase confidence the world over that the government is committed to reconciliation and ending abuses in Tibet.

“The Chinese government has invested a great deal in Tibet, and that was very clear to us. But that investment must not come at the price of an entire culture. You cannot confine a people’s culture and heritage – their very sense of identity – to a museum or a market of handicrafts.

“The human rights of the Tibetan people must be strengthened and protected, and I returned from the delegation visit with a renewed commitment to continue to work with my colleagues in Congress, with Leader Pelosi, to push for the reforms needed to achieve this. This is the reason we are here today.

Violations of the rights of the Tibetan people

“Terrible violations of the human rights of the Tibetan people by Chinese authorities have been occurring since the days of the Chinese invasion back in 1950. These violations have been consistently documented and publicized. All three UN General Assembly resolutions on Tibet – 1959, 1961, 1964 – recognize the violation of the fundamental human rights and freedoms of the Tibetan people, including the right to self-determination. It’s not like the world can say it doesn’t know.

“In its latest annual report, the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom found that, and I quote, “In 2015, the Chinese government maintained tight control of Tibetan Buddhists, strictly monitoring and suppressing their cultural and religious practices. Government-led raids on monasteries continued, and Chinese party officials in Tibet infiltrated monasteries with Communist Party propaganda. Reports indicated increased government interference in the education and training of young Buddhist monks.”

“Here’s some of what the U.S. State Department said in its most recent human rights report:

· ‘The government’s respect for, and protection of, human rights in the [Tibetan Autonomous Region, TAR] and other Tibetan areas remained poor. Under the professed objectives of controlling border areas, maintaining social stability, and combating separatism, the government engaged in the severe repression of Tibet’s unique religious, cultural, and linguistic heritage by, among other means, strictly curtailing the civil rights of China’s Tibetan population, including the freedoms of speech, religion, association, assembly, and movement. The government routinely vilified the Dalai Lama and blamed the ‘Dalai [Lama] Clique’ and “other outside forces” for instigating instability.”

· ‘[…] There was a perception among many Tibetans that authorities systemically targeted them for political repression, economic marginalization, and cultural assimilation, as well as educational and employment discrimination. The presence of […] security forces remained at high levels in many communities on the Tibetan Plateau […] Repression was severe throughout the year but increased in the periods before and during politically and religiously sensitive anniversaries and events. Authorities detained individuals in Tibetan areas after they reportedly protested against government or business actions, or expressed their support for the Dalai Lama.”

“Human rights reports tend to be written in pretty dry language – they’re meant to be somehow “objective,” not emotional. Their credibility depends on not being hysterical.

“But you know what? We need some emotion here. It’s not enough to understand in some intellectual sense the terrible repression in Tibet.

“Tibetans themselves have tried to shock our conscience. Since 2009, 143 Tibetans inside China have self-immolated: 143 people have taken the unimaginable step of setting themselves on fire, some to protest Chinese government policies, others to call for the return of the Dalai Lama. Most of them are believed to have died as a result. On the map to my side, you can see where the self-immolations occurred. What a terrible thing to have to do to try to get the world’s attention.

“Seven of these self-immolations happened in 2015. That’s fewer than the 11 in 2014, and way fewer than the 83 reported in 2012. But this decline is not because things have gotten better for Tibetans. It’s not because China has done anything at all to address Tibetan grievances. No, China has responded to the self-immolations by intensifying reprisals.

“In 2012, the Chinese authorities decided that the motive of self-immolators was “generally to split the country” and so they criminalized activities supposedly associated with self-immolation, including “organizing, plotting, inciting, compelling, luring, instigating, or helping others to commit self-immolation,” each of which may be prosecuted as “intentional homicide.”

“According to an August 2014 report by the International Campaign for Tibet (ICT), since 2012 at least 11 Tibetans were sentenced to prison terms or death on charges of “intentional homicide” for allegedly “aiding” or “inciting” others to self-immolate. The report also listed 98 Tibetans punished since 2010 due to alleged association with a self-immolation.

“Suffice it to say, this is not the right approach.

“Just like it’s not the right approach for the Chinese government to try to take over the reincarnation process. Last year marked the 20th anniversary of the disappearance of Gedhun Choekyi Nyima, also known as the Panchen Lama. Abducted at the age of six, the Panchen Lama has been held in secret by the Chinese government for more than two decades. Also in 2015, the government accused the Dalai Lama of “blasphemy” for suggesting he would not select a successor or reincarnate, effectively ending the line of succession – while also reiterating its own authority to select the next Dalai Lama.

“In case anyone has forgotten, the People’s Republic of China is officially atheist. I think we can probably all grasp the absurdity of having a government that professes atheism be the one to decide who the next Dalai Lama will be.

“Frankly, China is making one misstep after another in Tibet. Last July, Buddhist leader Tenzin Delek Rinpoche, who had been serving a 20-year sentence after being falsely accused of separatism and terrorism, died in prison. Chinese authorities cremated Tenzin Delek Rinpoche’s body against his family’s wishes and Buddhist practice, and detained his sister and niece for nearly two weeks after they requested his body be turned over to them.

“Tenzin Delek Rinpoche should never have died. He was ill, and many of us in the international community asked the Chinese authorities to grant him medical parole. They didn’t, and they bear responsibility for his death. And then to treat his body as they did – that was to pour salt in the wound.

“Or there’s the backstory to our CODEL. It seems that as we were preparing to travel to China last year, the Chinese authorities chose that moment to impose a lock down in Tibet.

“Here’s what a Tibetan living in Lhasa wrote about the conditions in late October and early November: “Lhasa was placed under extreme repression and the people were being constantly indoctrinated in political thoughts, using both violent and softer approaches. Free speech was also severely curtailed. So much so that people felt it difficult to even move their bodies […]”

“Anyone who thinks the human rights situation for the Tibetan people in China is improving, or is not so bad, is just wrong.”

New report reveals that equal treatment remains out of reach for LGBT Americans in most states

WASHINGTON – The Human Rights Campaign (HRC), the nation’s largest lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) civil rights organization, in partnership with the Equality Federation, released its first national report assessing the status of state legislation affecting LGBT equality across America, including in Massachusetts.

The inaugural State Equality Index (SEI) reveals that, even with progress on marriage equality, there are extraordinary state-to-state disparities in LGBT non-discrimination protections, including in the workplace, and efforts continue by equality opponents to pass state-level legislation that would sanction discrimination and undermine even minimal existing protections.

Massachusetts is one of 18 states in the country that has explicit state-level workplace protections for all LGBT employees. It is also one of 36 states with marriage equality. “Despite historic progress on issues like marriage equality, a majority of states still struggle to reach even a basic level of equality for LGBT people,” said HRC President Chad Griffin. “Most states lack statewide non-discrimination laws to protect LGBT people – putting countless individuals and families at risk, and creating inequalities in adoption and surrogacy, employments benefits, and youth safety and well-being.” “Even worse,” Griffin said, “equality opponents continue to push deeply harmful laws forward, including those seeking to undermine critical protections in the guise of “religious liberty.”

Though same-sex marriage is legal in 36 states and Washington, D.C., more than 111 million people, or 35 percent of Americans, live in states that have marriage but where LGBT people are not fully protected from discrimination in the workplace. And more than 206 million people nationwide live in states where every LGBT  person lacks fully-inclusive statewide workplace sexual orientation and gender identity protections.

In Massachusetts, basic non-discrimination laws protecting LGBT people have been passed, but advocates continue to work to build support for legislation that would protect transgender people from discrimination in the realm of public accommodations – including at stores, schools and other public and private facilities used by the public.

Massachusetts lawmakers are also expected to introduce a bill to protect youth from dangerous and medically-debunked conversion therapy.

The SEI assesses states on their LGBT-related legislation and policies, good and bad, in six areas: relationship recognition, parenting laws and policies, non-discrimination laws, hate crimes laws, anti-bullying laws, and health and safety laws and policies.

Based on that review, the SEI assigns states to one of four distinct categories. Massachusetts falls into the category, “Solidifying Equality.” Seven states and the District of Columbia are in the highest category, “Working Toward Innovative Equality” These states have marriage equality, robust LGBT non-discrimination laws that include employment, housing and public accommodations as well as protections in the realm of credit, insurance, and jury selection. Most allow transgender people to change official documents to reflect their gender identity. Many bar private insurers from banning transition-related healthcare. LGBT youth are protected by anti-bullying laws, as well as innovative measures in some states that address conversion therapy, inclusive juvenile justice policies, homelessness, and sexual education.

Seven states are in the category “Solidifying Equality” These states have marriage equality and non-discrimination protections, and are considered high-performing but not cutting edge on LGBT equality. Some states, however, lack explicit non-discrimination protections on the basis of gender identity. These states have relatively robust anti-bullying laws, but bad laws begin to crop up in this category.

Seven states are in the category “Building Equality” These have marriage equality and have taken steps toward more robust LGBT equality, including passing basic non-discrimination and hate crimes laws. Some lack explicit gender identity protections, and several lack comprehensive anti-bullying laws. Bad laws are more common, so advocates work to stop bills that undermine LGBT equality, and pass more comprehensive non-discrimination laws.

Twenty-nine states are in the worst-performing category “High Priority to Achieve Basic Equality” Most of these states have many laws that undermine LGBT equality, from those that criminalize HIV and sodomy, to measures allowing religious-based discrimination against LGBT people.

A handful of states have court-ordered marriage equality; none have non-discrimination laws that include sexual orientation or gender identity protections; few have hate crime laws. LGBT advocates largely work on killing bad bills, and on passing municipal protections for LGBT people. “We’re grateful to HRC for producing this invaluable tool. The SEI is an objective assessment of how we’re doing in the fight for fully lived equality and gives our elected officials a keen insight into the work that lies ahead, said interim Co-Executive Director of MassEquality Carly Burton. “Massachusetts was the first state in the nation to provide full marital rights for same-sex couples, but 10 years out from that historic victory, there is still more work to be done. We’re thrilled the HRC is releasing a vital report on our progress and areas for growth such as public accommodations protections for transgender people, support and services for homeless youth, the assurance of dignity for LGBTQ seniors as they age and addressing the crippling disparities experienced by communities of color.”

The full report, including detailed scorecards for every state, is available online at www.hrc.org/sei.

The Equality Federation on January 26 will launch a week-long educational campaign to bring attention to state disparities in LGBT protections.

The Human Rights Campaign is America’s largest civil rights organization working to achieve lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender equality. HRC envisions a world where LGBT people are embraced as full members of society at home, at work, and in every community. 

Public Review of the Worcester Police

By Gordon T. Davis

The rebellions in Ferguson, MO, regarding the killing of Michael Brown by the police have been the cause of some talk about a civilian review board for the police in Worcester.

A civilian review board is good public policy, as all public agencies need an effective periodic review of their work.  Police misconduct is an indication of the effectiveness of Worcester policing and law enforcement. There is today no real review of the Worcester Police Department’s work, whether that work is useful, ineffectual, or bad failure. There are no meaningful statistics collected or kept, and what information is kept is not available to the public.  Who can say if there is racial profiling or other type of bad policing happening?

The City Manager in theory reviews the work of the police department, but as we know from the past such reviews by the Manager are just rubber stamping of what the police Chief provides to the Manager. The Manager is supposed to be the “civilian review” of the police. He objectively is not.

We in the public are not able to have an objective opinion of the work or failings of the Worcester Police, as we just don’t have enough information or transparency.

I went to a Worcester Human Rights Commission meeting recently, and the good people there were reviewing a quarterly report of complaints brought against the Worcester Police. The report was cryptic, part of it being in code. The code was for the type of complaint. The Commissioners had a hard time with the report. Even if they could have figured it out, the Worcester Human Rights Commission could not release their findings without the permission of the Manager.

To be effective, a review of the police should be independent and free of conflicts of interests. The City Manager is certainly conflicted about anything negative about his administration.

Before going further I need to make full disclosures: I have been arrested four times, I have worked on the Justice for Cristino Hernandez Committee, I have relatives who are police officers, and I know that many cops are good people. I have an open mind on the issues.

In Worcester, public review of the police will take a form that might be different from anything else. Certainly it would be different than the Civilian Review Board found in Cambridge, MA. Worcester once had that type of review board which was a part of the Worcester Human Rights Commission. It had the power to investigate complaints against the City of Worcester. In the 1980s the Police Department rammed through a charter change that prevented the Worcester Human Rights Commission from investigating any complaints against the City. The commission cannot issue ANY report of any type without the approval of the City Manager.

The review of the police in Worcester will likely take the form of a nongovernmental agency that takes complaints against the police, helps complainants with their cases, and issues reports. To some extent these needs were performed by the Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts, when Ron Madnick was executive director. It still does work in this area, recently winning a case against the City in Federal Court. Chris Robarge and the attorney Beverly Chorbajian were significant protagonists for the plaintiffs, but that is a story for another day.

Hopefully, the talk of a public review of the police precipitated by the rebellions in Ferguson will result in the good public policy of civilian review of the police in Worcester, a rational outcome of the repeating story of Ferguson, MO.